Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (76587)	10/6/2003 2:04:30 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 82486

Your error. Mojo believes people are at risk of harm by the situation, not because one or both of them are inethical types. See. This is the same thing. I make a logical argument for my conclusion. You tell me I'm wrong and then make a declaration of Mojo's belief. If you think I'm wrong, ya gotta find the flaw in my argument, not just regurgitate beliefs.

To: one_less who wrote (76587)	10/6/2003 2:10:08 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

From the very beginning until now you have insisted that mojo sees a particular type of person as at risk...from the very beginning until now I have tried to demonstrate for you that you are not seeing his perspective at all. This is not about perspective, it's about logic. Mojo sees risk in massages. He sees risk only in massages of women and gays since he's actively massaging men. Ergo, there is something about women and gays that, unlike men, produces risk. What is it? Something is different. If it's not ethics, what is it? What is his reasoned basis for discriminating against them? Mojo believes people are at risk of harm by the situation, not because one or both of them are inethical types. If not ethics, then what?

To: one_less who wrote (76587)	10/6/2003 2:23:53 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Retraining suggests that he is unqualified or that his view point is deficient. You haven't validated that viewpoint you have only declared it...repeatedly. You forget that Mojo is the one who is out of step with his industry. I accept the approach of his professional organization. He doesn't. Reliance on a certifiable authority is the default in any argument. The onus is on him to demonstrate that he is right and the authority is wrong. Otherwise his viewpoint is deficient. The professional association is the rule and Mojo is the exception.