SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lurqer who wrote (29669)10/6/2003 4:37:38 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 89467
 
Bush as Sharon's doberman.

Bush is more like the bodyguard who holds victims by the arms so the boss can beat them up without risking a counterpunch.

TP



To: lurqer who wrote (29669)10/6/2003 7:35:20 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Iraq Awards Phone Licenses, Rebuffs U.S. Technology
Mon Oct 6,10:32 AM ET Add Top Stories - Reuters to My Yahoo!


By Mona Megalli and Fiona O'Brien

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq (news - web sites)'s U.S.-led government awarded licenses on Monday for firms to set up mobile phone networks, rebuffing calls by some American lawmakers to use U.S.-backed technology to restore war-shattered communications.
:
·





Iraqi Communications Minister Haidar al-Ebadi said Iraq's three regional networks would use the GSM system, already adopted across the Middle East. U.S.-backed technology is based on the CDMA (news - web sites) system.

The licenses are among the most potentially lucrative and high-profile contracts to be offered in postwar Iraq.

A functioning national phone system, which Iraq has lacked since Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was toppled in April, could also allow guerrillas fighting the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq to organize themselves better on a national level. The U.S. Army says guerrilla groups are only locally organized at present.

Iraq did not have a public mobile phone network during Saddam's rule and much of the land-line network was destroyed in the war that overthrew the former dictator.

"Until now, we were denied mobile phones. Iraqis will welcome the chance to use mobile phones to talk to their family, friends and for business purposes," Ebadi said, adding that the first person he would call would be his mother.

The new networks -- expected to be running within weeks according to Ebadi -- will be a boost for businesses and government ministries which have been struggling to function in a country where only satellite phones can be relied on.

Asked if U.S. intelligence services would monitor mobile phone traffic, Ebadi said: "I would be very reluctant to do that." He said he had already signed a decree banning the tapping of phone calls, and added that a functioning mobile system would make Iraq more secure, not less.

CONTROVERSIAL CHOICE

All three winning consortia included Iraqi businessmen as well as Arab telecoms firms. The northern network will be run by a Kurdish firm that already set up a network in areas autonomous from Saddam's rule, in partnership with Kuwaiti firm Wataniya.

Kuwait's MTC is a member of the consortium that won the southern license, and Egypt's Orascom Telecommunications leads the consortium running the key Baghdad and central Iraq network.

The choice of Kuwaiti companies to help run the phone network is a controversial one in a country where many Iraqis still resent their small southern neighbor after years of tension following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

The U.S.-led administration is racing to get Iraq's shattered economy back on its feet and attract foreign investment after years of dictatorship, sanctions and war.

Unemployment has fueled unrest in the country -- former soldiers from Saddam's army who lost their jobs when it was disbanded in May rioted in Baghdad and the southern city of Baghdad at the weekend.

Iraqi police shot dead two people in Baghdad and British troops killed an armed man in Basra during the clashes.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (news - web sites) was quoted as saying that the United States could face a prolonged and futile war in Iraq as the Soviet Union did in Afghanistan (news - web sites) in the 1980s. In an interview published on Monday in The New York Times, he called the U.S. decision to invade Iraq "an error."

Problems getting Iraq's ramshackle oil industry back on its feet in the face of persistent sabotage attacks are also hampering efforts to rebuild the economy.



Washington is seeking a new Security Council resolution giving the United Nations (news - web sites) a broader mandate in Iraq, hoping this will persuade reluctant countries to provide troops and cash for stabilizing and rebuilding the country.

But the United States faces an uphill struggle getting enough votes after U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) challenged the draft resolution last week.

Despite optimistic comments from U.S. officials, U.N. Security Council members say Annan's rejection of the American-British approach stopped progress in its tracks on a draft resolution, due to be discussed again this week.

Security Council members France and Russia have also said they are unhappy with the draft, and want it to include a roadmap for a faster handover of power to Iraqis.



To: lurqer who wrote (29669)10/7/2003 1:34:29 PM
From: NOW  Respond to of 89467
 
Grover Norquist comparing the esatate tax to the Holocaust!!!! UFB!!!
"Terry Gross, Grover Norquist and the Holocaust
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Terry Gross has a syndicated show on National Public Radio. It's called
"Fresh Air."

As a guest last week, Gross had on Grover Norquist, the head of
Americans for Tax Reform and the reputed architect of President Bush's
tax cuts.

One of Terry Gross' first questions to Grover Norquist was this one:

"Now the Bush tax cuts would cost us about $1.1 trillion over the next
10 years, and we're going to be hundreds of billions of dollars in debt.
At the same time, the president wants $87 billion to rebuild Iraq and
Afghanistan. Do you think we're in a tough spot, needing a lot of money,
to rebuild those two countries at the same time that we're cutting taxes?

And here's Grover Norquist's answer:

"Well, there's a very interesting use of the word 'we.' Every time you
use the word 'we,' you meant the government, and I tend to use the word
'we' to mean the American people and to speak of the government as the
government. So when the government doesn't take as much of your money
next year as it did last year, we have more money. The government has a
lower tax rate, and depending on economic growth, may have more or less
money, but we, the people, have more money. So it is a good thing for us
to have lower taxes."

Wow, Grover -- we can't use the word "we" anymore to refer to a
political entity called the government?

What do you propose we replace the word "we" with in the following, Grover?

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect
union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the
common defense, promote general welfare, and secure the blessing of
liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."

Terry Gross then moves on to the estate tax. Here's the back and forth:

Terry Gross: The estate tax is only paid by somebody who gets over $2
million in inheritance. So, you know, when you get out of poverty and
you cross that line which is -- What is it, like, $18,000 or something
that's officially poverty line?

Grover Norquist: Depends on how many kids you have. Yeah.

Terry Gross: Right. OK. So when you cross that, maybe you're making,
like, $20,000 or something. That's not going to help you with the estate
tax. I mean, you're talking about $2 million. That's a line people don't
cross a lot. That's -- I don't think that's ...

Grover Norquist: Yeah, the good news about the move to abolish the death
tax, the tax where they come and look at how much money you've got when
you die, how much gold is in your teeth and they want half of it, is
that -- you're right, there's an exemption for -- I don't know -- maybe
a million dollars now, and it's scheduled to go up a little bit.
However, 70 percent of the American people want to abolish that tax.
Congress, the House and Senate, have three times voted to abolish it.
The president supports abolishing it, so that tax is going to be
abolished. I think it speaks very much to the health of the nation that
70-plus percent of Americans want to abolish the death tax, because they
see it as fundamentally unjust. The argument that some who played at the
politics of hate and envy and class division will say, 'Yes, well,
that's only 2 percent,' or as people get richer 5 percent in the near
future of Americans likely to have to pay that tax.

I mean, that's the morality of the Holocaust. 'Well, it's only a small
percentage,' you know. 'I mean, it's not you, it's somebody else.'

And this country, people who may not make earning a lot of money the
centerpiece of their lives, they may have other things to focus on, they
just say it's not just. If you've paid taxes on your income once, the
government should leave you alone. Shouldn't come back and try and tax
you again.

Terry Gross: Excuse me. Excuse me one second. Did you just ...

Grover Norquist: Yeah?

Terry Gross: . compare the estate tax with the Holocaust?

Grover Norquist: No, the morality that says it's OK to do something to
do a group because they're a small percentage of the population is the
morality that says that the Holocaust is OK because they didn't target
everybody, just a small percentage. What are you worried about? It's not
you. It's not you. It's them. And arguing that it's OK to loot some
group because it's them, or kill some group because it's them and
because it's a small number, that has no place in a democratic society
that treats people equally. The government's going to do something to or
for us, it should treat us all equally. ."

Terry Gross: So you see taxes as being the way they are now terrible
discrimination against the wealthy comparable to the kind of
discrimination of, say, the Holocaust?

Grover Norquist: Well, what you pick -- you can use different rhetoric
or different points for different purposes, and I would argue that those
who say, 'Don't let this bother you; I'm only doing it' -- I, the
government. The government is only doing it to a small percentage of the
population. That is very wrong. And it's immoral. They should treat
everybody the same. They shouldn't be shooting anyone, and they
shouldn't be taking half of anybody's income or wealth when they die."

First of all, Grover, the morality underpinning the estate tax is the
not same as the "morality" underpinning the holocaust.

The holocaust was mass killing driven by a racist ideology. There is no
morality there.

The estate tax is a moral tax -- taxing the wealth of the super-rich to
help the not so super-rich -- it's called progressive taxation.

According to Bill Gates Sr. and Chuck Collins of the group Responsible
Wealth, nearly half of all estate taxes are paid by the wealthiest 0.1
percent of the American population -- a few thousand families each year.

In 2001, Gates was the lead signer on Responsible Wealth's Call to
Preserve the Estate Tax, which was signed by over 1,000 wealthy people
personally affected by the estate tax -- including George Soros, Ted
Turner, and David Rockefeller Jr. He points out that since it was
enacted in 1916, the estate tax has helped to limit the concentration of
wealth, making it easier for Americans to educate themselves, innovate,
build new businesses, and prosper.

Gates also points out that while there is no question that "some people
accumulate great wealth through hard work, intelligence, creativity, and
sacrifice" it is equally important to acknowledge "the influence of
other factors, such as luck, privilege, other people's efforts, and
society's investment in the creation of individual wealth such as a
patent system, enforceable contracts, open courts, property ownership
records, protection against crime and external threats, and public education."

The father of the man with the billions understands the word "we."

Get it, Grover?

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter, corporatecrimereporter.com. Robert Weissman is
editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor,
multinationalmonitor.org. They are co-authors of Corporate
Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe,
Maine: Common Courage Press; corporatepredators.org).

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

This article is posted at: <http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2003/000162.html>.
_______________________________________________

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
<http://www.corporatepredators.org>.