Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (11145)	10/7/2003 8:53:48 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793800

The reporters told her the editor killed the article... Jill is on a "vendetta" at the moment, so I as discount her report. But I do think the Times spiked the story to support Davis. The LA Editorial staff is really in tight with the "West Side Liberal" crowd in LA. They don't want the Dems to lose. Here is a rundown from "Opinion Journal" that really describes the situation in California. ____________________________________________________ REVIEW & OUTLOOK The California Stakes See what happens when you put liberals in charge? Tuesday, October 7, 2003 12:01 a.m. As Californians head to the polls today to decide the fate of Governor Gray Davis, we hope all of the sex-related Sturm und Drang of the past few days doesn't obscure the larger picture. What the recall represents is a referendum on the record of modern "progressive" politics. Not long ago, our friends on the left were hailing Sacramento's liberal-controlled government as the harbinger of a new national Democratic majority. Writing in the June 2001 American Prospect, Harold Meyerson was only mildly more florid than the average pundit in explaining "California's new-found identity as a laboratory of both Democracy and democracy." In this liberal vision of Eden, where California "is uniformly under Democratic control," Mr. Meyerson noted with approval the enactment of more and more living wage, health-care and worker-rights ordinances. "In city after city," he wrote, "a civic left has emerged in California, with the state's new-model labor movement--the most dynamic in the country--at its core." In one sense, he was right: The left got what it wanted because much of that agenda has in fact been implemented in California in the past five years. And today, the voting "lab rats" will let Sacramento know what they think of this grand experiment. They've already rendered a verdict of sorts by inviting the recall, and by showing in every poll before the groping and "Hitler" stories broke that they wanted to throw Mr. Davis and his allies out. What Californians have witnessed is what the modern liberal coalition looks like in power: a gerrymandered majority dominated by the "progressive" special-interest trinity of trial lawyers, unions (especially of public employees) and environmentalists. Their priorities are the transfer of wealth from working people to an ever-expanding public sector; more mandates and rules on business that enhance union power but reduce the ability to invest at a profit and create new jobs; and of course legal standards and workers' compensation loopholes that create more openings for trial-lawyer assaults. These columns have recorded the litany of this achievement frequently over the past five years. But note well that even with their Governor at risk of being recalled, these liberal interests have shown no restraint. As their final, pre-recall act, they pushed through a radical new mandate requiring all California businesses with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance. Governor Davis, trying to save his skin by pandering for more liberal votes, signed it during the weekend. Mr. Davis, we should acknowledge, did not start out on this same left-wing course. For a couple of years he rode the dot-com boom and governed from the middle, as these columns noted with approval. But then the energy crisis hit, and rather than tell voters the truth he embraced his party's anti-business base to survive. The result has been spending that has climbed 40% in four years, a $38 billion budget deficit, and business and energy costs that have caused tens of thousands to flee the state. Mr. Davis barely survived his re-election in 2002, even with a feckless GOP campaign and friendly media. Both he and Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante looked certain to lose the recall votes before the recent, late media hits on Arnold Schwarzenegger. Perhaps they will luck out one more time. But if Californians can look past these distractions, they will see a state brought low by deliberate policies and interests that they now have a chance to restrain and repudiate. And whether or not the recall succeeds, the rest of America has had an object lesson in how a liberal Congress and Presidency would govern. Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. opinionjournal.com