Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76717)	10/7/2003 10:46:35 AM
From: Solon	Respond to of 82486

"So that's my take on it, at least today's take. All my takes are presented as works in progress" Yes...the revisions will come but he will need to find rambling and vague language to present it first. Rather than wait for the inevitable, I wil simply state it: His only remaining option which resolves the contradiction inherent in the gay/women/lust argument is to declare (by means of a rambling story with vague language and liberally salted with peaches, pebbles, and ponies) that MOHO feels responsible for the thoughts and the feelings that both gays and women have. That he does not wish to merely limit their control as per the social contract, but he wishes to ensure they will not have sexual thoughts or feelings--at least not while they are on his table. He will ignore the fact that most people have ways and places to turn themselves on and that sex massages are available everywhere to those who are looking for THAT. He will also ignore the fact that it is none of his damned business what other people think or feel. And he will ignore the fact that his presumption that his magic hands are bound to turn-on long-tailed mice while turning off the curly-tailed mice is fallacious--not fellatio. And once we have spent a month pinning that one down, Rambi's intelligence will have shrunk to where it will fit inside a little pea. And the only thing left of mine will be the grin that survived the cat. And as for you...learn to grunt!

To: Lane3 who wrote (76717)	10/7/2003 11:55:27 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

Yes, presumably. Since the lust in his heart argument doesn't cover his discrimination against gays, that then seems more like plain vanilla prejudice. That shooooooould indicate to you that your analysis does not make sense...but go on with your love in hating and justifying your hating of this guy who is not as you have labeled him. You have not understood the basis for mojo's position at all but you have judged it and drawn conclusions about it. I would be happy to help you but you have demonstrated a very strong resistence to understanding mojo's point of view and a verrrrry strong preference to reducing and parcing things to justify your expressions of disgust...so be it. lost cause probably.... You have bought into the solon twisted reversioning. Nothing new, your little pom poms have been a flashing all the while. I will not tell you what is obvious about what you are doing lest I be accused of personal attacks oooooh shake shake...