Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (76741)	10/7/2003 2:12:18 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"I won't be able to assess which is correct until and unless you explain him." For starters, stop hanging around the campfire listening to solon's scary ghost stories.

To: one_less who wrote (76741)	10/7/2003 3:54:49 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

you have refused to follow the train of though I am not refusing to follow it. I may not be following it, but I am not refusing. I am not able to follow it despite extraordinary effort. Why do you continue to insist on implying the ugliest of motives to me? I think the problem is more that there is no train. There's a wheel here and a whistle there, but no train. His belief statement is an explanation of its own. Oh, yes, the belief statement. I remember that Perhaps you recall how that came to be. It was crafted by moi after a long series of interviews reminiscent of pulling your teeth--the back ones. Part of the extraordinary effort that you seem to interpret as refusal, doncha know. I thought you had abandoned it given that I wrote it and I am accused of not having a clue where Mojo's coming from. If I crafted it but don't have a clue, then the belief statement cannot be accurate. Logic 101. But sure, I can go back to the belief statement. I have it clipped for posterity. <<Belief: that the practice of massaging anyone whom he might turn on or who might turn him on is harmful because the lesser standard does not adequately deter sexual misconduct in the massage biz. >> And then there's also: <<Principle: he stands firm that he won't accept any women or gays as clients in his own practice. >> Are you reconfirming that, as well?