Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (76750)	10/7/2003 1:56:26 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

I agree that, as stated, there is no discrimination based on the mere fact of being female or homosexual, but that it is founded on scruples about occasions of arousal. The effect, however, is discriminatory, and therefore requires active exemption, I suppose. I agree that the discrimination is not particularly harmful, insofar as not many would invoke a right to the exemption, and, in any case, why should it matter if massage is freed of all potential sexual charge?