Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76796)	10/7/2003 4:48:43 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

So, what did you have for lunch?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76796)	10/7/2003 4:52:43 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You sent a biting post to me declaring your self to be the author of the mojo belief. I politely said I was sorry but you are mistaken and that I would look for the original statement of mojo's belief. It took me a long time and I found it. I also confirmed the statements you authored that were some what descriptive of the mojo view point; in answer to your doubtful comment that I could see these statements that you have made, as validly connected to the mojo scenario. So what is this supposed to mean? "My goodness, man, are we on the same planet?" Apparently you think we are talking about different things but I do not know what you are referring to. Care to clue me in???

To: Lane3 who wrote (76796)	10/7/2003 5:18:34 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

”I'm looking forward to your producing the record of your creative effort. This is starting to get really funny.” I am still not getting it. "His belief is that it is wrong to put people into a situation where there is a reasonable possibility that they could become sexualized inapropriately." I think I added "unnecessarily" at the end of that statement for the posts that came later; but I don't think that significantly alters the idea we were discussing. post 75024 seems to be the first occurrance. I have copied and pasted that statement into a few posts since then. I am looking forward to your explanation of the funniness.