To: unclewest who wrote (116343 ) 4/9/2004 6:51:31 PM From: Bilow Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500 Hi unclewest; About those danged Iraqis. I'm wondering if your views on them have been changed by the recent uptick in the war. Here's some stuff I'd like to hear you clarify: unclewest, October 6, 2003 I do not understand why a few hundred local demonstrators are worthy of non-stop international news coverage. Demonstrations occur in America every day. Yet very few receive more than a cursory glance by local press. And since when is a successful American effort to prevent violence costly to our goodwill? #reply-19376915 So is our effort to prevent violence still successful? unclewest, October 7, 2003 Yet the present situation confronting our soldiers does not seem to be of Iraqi origin . The current fight in Iraq (according to my sources) does not include but a few Iraqis. The rest are imported foreigners. #reply-19379919 By the way, this earlier (silly) claims that our problems in Iraq were not of Iraqi origin is logically incompatible with the neocon claim that other countries were cowed by us going into Iraq. -- Carl P.S. I am reminded of our exchange from well before the war: Bilow, May 28, 2002... Unconditional surrender is a simple policy objective. "Limited war" as in Vietnam, is a much more difficult thing, particularly when the objective is to make the other guy quit fighting. Here is an example of what the loser says when the fighting really is over: I am tired of fighting. Our chiefs are killed. Looking Glass is dead. Toohoolhoolzote is dead. The old men are all dead. It is the young men who say, "Yes" or "No." He who led the young men [Olikut] is dead. It is cold, and we have no blankets. ... Getting the other guy to say something like this should be the objective of offensive (i.e. going into another guys territory and breaking things) military action. Anything less is to throw away the lives of our men, and to uselessly take the lives of those on the other side. Weak action only deepens the anger of the other side and makes him believe that he can outlast you . #reply-17521454 unclewest, in replyCarl, I could not agree more. But nowadays that is a hard sell. Most do not seem ready to accept the history lesson that to end a war you must apply maximum violence . #reply-17521715 Here it is 1 year after the Iraq invasion and the thing is collapsing for the usual reason. The basic problem is that the American public, or at least that part of the American public that makes up the swing vote, just isn't interested in applying maximum violence. And so, here we are. Stuck in the same trap as with Vietnam. Too stupid to fish, and too stubborn to cut bait. I say that we will eventually cut bait. We will eventually return to a situation where we drop bombs on them from high altitude, and they shake their fists at us.