Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Arnold for Governor! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (468)	10/8/2003 1:14:56 AM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 773

That's less than two percent per year. Here are the latest available figures, updated through July 2002, from the U.S. Buruea of the Census: eire.census.gov They show continued growth of more than one but less than two percent per year. The latest figure was 35,116,033 in July 2002. California's population growth rate has slowed, not accelerated, during the Davis years, while per capita spending has absolutely exploded. Those are facts, and if you spent even a modest amount of time looking at them you'd pick a different argument or just acknowledge that Davis did an awful job of restraining state spending. By the way, the biggest two factors in real estate values (besides location) are jobs and interest rates, not overall population increasing at such a slow rate. You are simply wrong.