SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hdl who wrote (159445)10/8/2003 7:00:29 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
I know how it works, hdl. My point was that the Dems can't make that claim - that he lacks legitimacy because more people voted for Davis.



To: hdl who wrote (159445)10/10/2003 4:59:48 AM
From: Cyprian  Respond to of 164684
 
Joe Bananas
amconmag.com

[Stalin’s Last Crime: The Plot Against the Jewish Doctors 1948-1953, Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov, HarperCollins, 416 pages]

By R.J. Stove

Forget cheap Dickensian antitheses. It was the worst of times, it was the worst of times. Between 1948 and 1953 the chief lunatic of Soviet Russia’s insane asylum planned another mass primal-scream session, at least as spectacular as the 1930s bouts of Moscow show-trial therapy. Only now, with Stalin’s Last Crime, are most readers in a position to perceive how near Uncle Joe came to achieving his valiant goal. This harrowing, unforgettable account dwells, as its authors themselves observe, “in the borderland between Marx Brothers absurdity and Shakespearean tragedy.” It provides an improbable assurance that major commercial publishers can still issue serious historical research, as opposed to what Garry Wills and Daniel Goldhagen peddle.

Before the 1940s, Stalin’s public attitudes towards Jews in general consisted of unabashed spite followed by comparative prudence. At a 1907 congress he cheerily urged, to weed out Mensheviks, “a pogrom within the party”: language that sounded rather insensitive even in 1907. Afterwards Stalin minded his tongue with greater skill, not least because many leading Bolsheviks were Jews, and even those who were Gentiles (Sergei Kirov, V.M. Molotov, and Kliment Voroshilov, to name three of the most renowned) had Jewish wives. We find him, in his dictatorship’s early years, making anti-Semitic behavior punishable by imprisonment or death and deeming such behavior “the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.” (Not for him, by this stage, Khrushchev’s folksy candor in complaining to Poland’s Communist leadership, “You have already too many Abramoviches.”) The Order of Lenin’s 1939 recipients included a batch of writers in Yiddish; Trotsky himself stopped short of bemoaning any anti-Jewish malice on Stalin’s part; as late as 1948, Jews accounted for 40 out of 190 Stalin-Prize recipients. Yet restrictions on Jews’ employment within the Soviet bureaucracy had begun during the Second World War. Snarls in Pravda editorials against “rootless cosmopolites” started in 1947. And Golda Meir’s visit to Moscow —where she attracted frenzied crowds that could have been easily enough dispersed by Stalin’s fiat—occurred only months after the assassination (sorry, comrades, “fatal car crash”) of Jewish Antifascist Committee boss Solomon Mikhoels.

Much as Kirov’s murder served as the immediate pretext for the 1930s purges, so the origins of the “Doctors’ Plot” lay in the August 1948 demise of Andrei Zhdanov, who for most of the previous two years had been among Stalin’s most internationally notorious henchmen, principally for his crusade against any poet, novelist, or composer with the slightest capacity for creative independence. Zhdanov’s tirades had included his description (in a perverse way, immortal) of Anna Akhmatova as “a nun or a whore—or rather both a nun and a whore who combines harlotry with prayer.” Even Brent and Naumov, incidentally, cannot surpass Clive James’s analysis of Zhdanov’s diatribes:

Reading his [Zhdanov’s] smug prose is like being vouchsafed a glimpse into the mind of an obscene phone-caller, except that the range of ambition not merely encompasses the disturbance of your domestic innocence but includes starvation, torture, bitter cold and a broken back.

(more...)



To: hdl who wrote (159445)10/21/2003 8:56:19 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Amazon disapoints inflated expectations ..

Amazon.com (AMZN 58.06 -1.29) stock has traded 2% lower following the internet retailer's in line Q4 (Dec) and FY04 outlooks. After topping the Reuters Research top and bottom-line consensus estimates in its Q3 (Sept) report, the company said it expected Q4 (Dec) revenue growth of 23-34%, to $1.76-1.91 bln, which only encompassed the consensus expectation of $1.78 bln. Management did add, however, that it expects its biggest holiday shopping season ever thanks to free shipping and low prices. As for FY04, the company pegged net sales at $5.75-6.25 bln as compared to the consensus of $6.12 bln.



To: hdl who wrote (159445)10/26/2003 9:52:06 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
geeez .. ever since amzn issued disapointing guidance, this place has turned into a ghost town ..

So much for the new bubble ..

Somebody turn the lights out if you leave ..