SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (77076)10/9/2003 3:27:36 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Right. I think the criticisms were trying to expose unjust harm. In some cases (the solon concocted reversion) it was more of the unkind type.



To: Neocon who wrote (77076)10/9/2003 3:47:07 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"By the way, whether or not someone is hurt is never the main point of ethical dissection.

That may be, however the claims (some of them pretty extreme) of harm that could be caused by a mojo scenario were never born out in the discussion, as having any qualitative substance.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News