Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (77265)	10/10/2003 4:58:32 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

If he were sued, it would depend on what basis and what was being requested. I think it's precipitous to assume that he would have to give up his livelihood. Perhaps some woman just wanted cash for her pain and suffering. Mojo could pay up and go back to business as usual, hoping he could go another eight or however many years without being sued again. That might be an acceptable cost of doing business. Or it may be that the lawsuit focused on some particular aspect of his business practice that he could correct, like merging his business with cousin Myrna's rather than offending someone with a referral. The penalty should be proportionate to the offence.