Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (11711)	10/10/2003 9:58:25 PM
From: sullie6	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793957

John, how dare you? I'm simply asking reasonable questions based solely on things you have discussed. If you ask me, it really seems that you are the one who who hammers people, then you turn the tables on those who call you out. You were the one to speak poorly about people on this thread. You said all we do is post in an angry, hostile, or abusive manner (flaming). You had ten reasons why were weren't worthy or capable of holding a serious discussion. And you basically called us all racists to boot. Now what did I say to deserve being insulted so terribly by you?

To: JohnM who wrote (11711)	10/10/2003 10:31:57 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793957

John, Bill presented two decent articles and we discussed it a bit. You disagreed without offering any serious analysis or studies. Feel free, but there are dozens of studies which back up my assertions. No one said they were the only causal factors, but they're certainly primary ones. Research requires an open enquiring mind. I discovered long ago on SI this is not the forum for that type of thing. Besides, most of us are here to have fun and banter a bit, not get into serious research, looking for the right instrument and so forth.