Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (116587)	10/11/2003 11:20:42 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Respond to of 281500

<a political commentator who does not advocate change by violence.> On the contrary, both of them (Robertson and his guest) are on record, advocating change by violence. Didn't they support Regime Change in Iraq? Didn't that happen violently? And Regime Change in Afghanistan? Another violent change. And the demographic change in Palestine, from Muslim to Jewish, a change that has a 100-year track record of happening violently? Don't they support that, with much gusto, even claiming that God wants it that way, and said so in Revelations? They are very vocal and very supportive of violent change, all over the world: Iran, Syria, N. Korea, Libya...the list is long. And, during the Cold War, they also supported change by violence all over the world, from Nicaragua to Iran to Vietnam. Yes, Pat Robertson and friends are systematic supporters of violence, as a way to achieve political goals. Nuking the State Department, with the Washington metro area as "collateral damage" would be entirely true to form, for them. These "Christians" are Old Testament Christians, not New Testament Christians. They define "loving your enemy" as UnAmerican.