To: John McCarthy who wrote (9296 ) 10/13/2003 9:33:51 AM From: Biomaven Respond to of 52153 I've held NASI in the past, but currently have no position. This study looks like it didn't quite give them the answers they expected (hence the plan to study at different time points after chemo), but is still interesting:Press Release Source: North American Scientific, Inc. North American Scientific Releases Preliminary Observations From European Clinical Trials Monday October 13, 9:25 am ET CHATSWORTH, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 13, 2003--North American Scientific, Inc. (Nasdaq:NASI - News) today announced observations from an internal preliminary review of images and clinical data from the first 28 subjects enrolled in an ongoing European clinical trial being conducted by its Theseus Imaging subsidiary regarding the Hynic-Annexin V product candidate. Tc-99m-Hynic-Annexin V, an imaging agent that targets dying cells, is under study to assess its efficacy in the early detection of tumor response to chemotherapy. ADVERTISEMENT [] Each of the initial 28 subjects was studied with Hynic-Annexin V imaging immediately before and approximately 24 hours following initiation of chemotherapy. At the time of review, 22 of these 28 subjects had either completed the post-treatment computed tomography (CT) scan required to assess chemotherapy response or had succumbed to their disease prior to the scheduled CT and were considered evaluable for response prediction. Of the other six subjects, three were not evaluable for response prediction because they had technically inadequate studies or did not return for follow-up CT, and three awaited follow-up CT at the time of review. The prospective study design called for administration of Hynic-Annexin V prior to chemotherapy (baseline) and 4-72 hours after initiation of chemotherapy. The study was designed to evaluate whether uptake in the tumor area soon after initiation of chemotherapy compared to pretreatment baseline tumor uptake is predictive of response or lack of response to the treatment regimen. In the study Tc-99m-Hynic-Annexin V results are compared to the subject's tumor response as assessed by conventional computed tomography X-ray images 6-12 weeks later and following at least two courses of chemotherapy. Hynic-Annexin V imaging results in this study do not influence the clinical course of treatment. The initial 22 completed and evaluable subjects imaged following initiation of chemotherapy were classified as responders if they showed a minimum 23% increase in tumor uptake of Hynic-Annexin V over the baseline image. Although the protocol calls for imaging between 4 and 72 hours post-initiation of treatment, all subjects now evaluable were imaged at a similar time point approximately 24 hours after the start of treatment. Initial results suggest that the optimal imaging time has not yet been determined. One of five subjects who responded to chemotherapy had increased 24 hour post-treatment uptake of Hynic-Annexin V, Four of five subjects who responded to chemotherapy had reductions in 24 hour post-treatment uptake of Hynic-Annexin V from baseline All 17 subjects who did not respond to chemotherapy had no post-treatment increase in Hynic-Annexin V uptake at 24 hours, 17 of 21 subjects with no increased uptake of Hynic-Annexin V in the tumor at 24 hours post initiation of treatment had no objective response to treatment All five of the subjects who responded to chemotherapy showed visually evident uptake of Hynic-Annexin V in the baseline pretreatment image. This finding suggests that the tumors in the responders were associated with some ongoing degree of spontaneous apoptosis, consistent with a population of tumor cells capable of undergoing programmed cell death. It is known that many tumors are characterized by mutations that render them unable to undergo programmed cell death, even in response to treatment. It is theorized that this is a principal reason why so many tumors fail to respond to treatments that have been shown to kill normal cells or susceptible tumor cells. Conversely, of the 17 subjects that did not respond to chemotherapy, only eight showed visually evident uptake of Hynic-Annexin V in the baseline image. Our preliminary interpretation of this data is that the absence of visually evident uptake of Hynic-Annexin V in the baseline may predict resistance to chemotherapy, whereas the presence of visually evident baseline Hynic-Annexin V uptake identifies a group of patients in whom there may be a response rate to chemotherapy. These findings suggest that the tumors of many nonresponders may lack a significant cellular population capable of undergoing apoptosis. While an analysis of baseline images as a predictor of disease sensitivity to chemotherapy and an analysis of a decrease in tumor Hynic-Annexin V uptake soon after treatment were not original objectives of this study, these findings in this first group of 22 subjects will now be pursued as new subjects are enrolled in the study. Further studies will be required to confirm this data. Enrollment in these Phase II studies in Europe is expected to continue in order to evaluate post-treatment assessment at time points other than 24 hours. It is believed that the additional Phase II studies and follow-on analysis at alternative time points will take approximately six to nine months. Dr. Neil Steinmetz, Theseus Medical Director, stated, "We believe that further studies at additional imaging times should identify the optimal time for imaging increased apoptosis in responders. The decreased tumor uptake in some of the responders after treatment is analogous to a decrease in cell death at intermediate time points demonstrated in recent animal studies at Stanford University. In this model, there was a marked increase in apoptosis at later time points following chemotherapy. In addition, the imaging results reviewed to date suggest that the pretreatment Hynic-Annexin V images may be useful in the noninvasive assessment of tumor capacity to undergo apoptosis in response to treatment, and we will be including an analysis of predictions based on these images to the study." L. Michael Cutrer, North American Scientific's President and CEO, commented on the interim analysis: "We believe that changes in the post-treatment imaging time may provide data that better corresponds to the hypothesis. Our U.S. clinical trial protocols incorporate images at varying time points following chemotherapy." Cutrer concluded, "We continue to believe the Hynic-Annexin V program is a valuable product opportunity for the Company and we will continue to evaluate target markets and opportunities related to the program, including strategic partnerships." Peter