SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (2768)10/13/2003 10:11:19 AM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 36918
 
Meanwhile Bush continues to push for the destruction of our most precious air...in Yellowstone
The Snowmobile Quagmire

October 13, 2003




In mid-December the snowmobiling season is scheduled to
open in Yellowstone National Park - another winter of
health risks for park workers and visitors, pollution haze
over the west entrance and Old Faithful, the din of a fleet
of noisy machines in an otherwise silent park and daily
harassment of winter-stressed animals. By siding with the
snowmobile industry and overturning a Clinton-era plan to
phase out snowmobiles, the Bush administration would
continue a practice that violates the conclusions of its
own Environmental Protection Agency, the better judgment of
many National Park Service employees, the public will and
common sense. In its own small way, the snowmobile issue
demonstrates once again that when it comes to public lands
the administration is always willing to sacrifice public
good for private interest.

The basic question at issue should be winter access. How do
you get the most people into the park at a beautiful time
of year with the least harm to the park? Some people will
come on cross-country skis. Most will ride on snow coaches,
the specially equipped, environmentally benign buses that
travel over snow-packed roads. But to the White House the
issue isn't access for humans but access for snowmobiles.
And in the way they've handled this matter, the Interior
Department and the snowmobile manufacturers have been
guilty of disingenuousness at best, lying at worst.

The Park Service is legally committed to allowing only
snowmobiles that meet a standard of "best available
technology." Until a few years ago, most snowmobiles had
two-stroke engines that were loud, dirty and fast. In 2002,
manufacturers began introducing four-stroke machines that
were, in fact, quieter and cleaner, though slower and less
powerful. But there's backsliding already: this year's new
four-stroke snowmobiles, while cleaner than the older
machines, are more powerful, noisier and dirtier than last
year's. Put simply, the quest for power seems quickly to
have replaced the quest for the best available technology.
Even the Park Service has admitted that some of this year's
fleet will not pass muster - but will be allowed into the
park anyway.

President Bush's E.P.A. has reached essentially the same
conclusion reached by the Park Service during the Clinton
administration. Compared with snow coaches, snowmobiles of
any kind are more polluting and more disturbing to wildlife
and to visitors who aren't on snowmobiles.

Americans have been quick to see the common sense behind
this issue. In previous comment periods, the public
overwhelmingly opposed snowmobiles in Yellowstone. Even
legislators have caught the drift of public opinion. In
July, a number of Republican congressmen crossed party
lines to ban snowmobiles in the park by a House vote of 211
to 209. That vote stood until Rob Portman, a Republican
from Ohio and the liaison between the Republican House
leadership and the White House, changed his vote, resulting
in deadlock and defeat.

There is still hope for a satisfactory conclusion to this
debate. Even as the public comment period for the Interior
Department's snowmobiling plan comes to a close tomorrow,
environmental groups are preparing to argue in court for
the enforcement of already enacted laws that would prohibit
snowmobiling in Yellowstone, with a decision expected by
mid-November. We hope that that decision will close the
park to snowmobiles for good. We also hope that the
decision will afford the park a year or two to phase out
the machines, giving the snowmobiling economy of West
Yellowstone a chance to adjust to the new reality.

But think of it this way. If the Clinton plan had been
followed from the outset - without the Bush
administration's cynical delay - West Yellowstone would
already have adjusted, and the park this winter would be
silent.

nytimes.com

CC