Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (116705)	10/13/2003 3:24:48 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

What happens if these terms are violated? "Pledging" isn't good enough. They have to do it, with consequences if they don't. Oops, I think you found the weak spot. But by the time the Palestinians start up the terror again, Israel will have withdrawn from the territories and evacuated a number of major settlements. Ariel has about 30,000 people I believe. (Tell me, why is the possibility of having any Jews stay in Palestine never even discussed? Probably for the same reason you are more outraged over Israeli marriage laws than Palestinian honor killings). We know Hamas is not going to be satisfied with an end to the occupation of 1967; they say so. So then if Hamas, Fatah et. al. come the reasonable conclusion that all this Israeli withdrawal proves that terror is working, time to push on to final victory, what happens then? But the point is moot, as this whole "agreement" has been drawn up between Palestinians without power and Israeli who are not only without power, but whose positions have been thoroughly repudiated, trounced, annihilated, at the ballot box.