Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (77475)	10/13/2003 2:16:36 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 82486

I thought I was wondering about normal issues that would be raised. The unforeseen consequences alluded to were the remoter consequences of the matter. The confusion was accidental. I am not sure that liability can be assigned. The question is, given the confusion, is he bound by the implicit contract? If he has the right to refuse service to a female, I am not sure that an agreement premised upon a mistake can be held against him. If he had solicited business I might feel that he had a greater obligation to make his terms explicit. But this was pure word of mouth referral, which is why I brought up the concierge's role. All of this is tentative, however.......