Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (116740)	10/13/2003 2:40:33 PM
From: FaultLine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Quite an impressive list! I think we've all been hearing this stuff for years and years. What, just exactly, is your point and why is this appropriate for FADG? <stifles yawn> --fl

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (116740)	10/13/2003 3:14:03 PM
From: nealio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

LL, I hope you didn't spend too much time on this, because it really has not relevancy until you make a comparative list for another president with the same ardent furor that you put into this effort. I'm going to take an educated guess that any president, with the huge # of people a politician of this importance meets in his day to day work, would have this many 'ambiguous ties' to people that died...and anyone can say a death was suspicious without having to provide the evidence...Yes, you would also have to provide a little more evidence before your list had real validity. And no, I'm not a Clinton lover, just hate biased rants, as they benefit no one, not even yourself...this has definitely diminished your relevancy in discussions here, as Faultline pointed out... Cheers, Neal