Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (475535)	10/13/2003 4:17:39 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Wow, a lot facts. I enjoyed you post.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (475535)	10/13/2003 4:19:49 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 769667

You are under arrest. You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to an attorney. Wait a minute, you are an attorney. You can just talk to yourself then. You are charged with cruelty to vacuous vapors.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (475535)	10/13/2003 4:22:09 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Those Bush budgets dont include the war costs. They always leave out those costs. So add that in. Then look at the revenues. The severe revenue shortfall makes it impossible to pay for these rising budgets.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (475535)	10/14/2003 6:33:34 PM
From: exdaytrader76	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Bush is fiscally conservative? Your numbers are all about expenditures. What about the $ the gov't brings in versus what it spends, ie the deficit? It doesn't matter what Bush spends if the gov't brings in enough money. If we had a surplus, it would be a different matter. We don't have a surplus anymore. We donated a lot of it to Haliburton and the defense contractors. Spending more money than you have is not fiscally conservative.