Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gamesmistress who wrote (12205)	10/14/2003 6:31:02 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793624

I normally read "Boondocks" online at the Washington Post. I noticed this last night. This strip is in the same category as "Doonesbury" when it comes to politics. It also puts down Rap Artists quite a bit. "Romenesko" __________________________ WashPost passes on "Boondocks" with Condoleezza mention Washington Post \| ucomics.com "The Washington Post has decided not to publish this week's Boondocks strip," the paper says on its website. "The comic will return to washingtonpost.com Oct. 19." Here is today's "Boondocks," ucomics.com with a character sayng: "Maybe if there was a man in the world who Condoleezza truly loved, she wouldn't be so hell-bent on destroying it." > A READER WRITES: "As a woman, I can appreciate that this is a rather sexist storyline, but I have to wonder if the Post is most afraid of offending one particularly powerful woman, and jeopardizing its access to information." poynter.org