Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (39612)	10/15/2003 3:12:44 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hello Malcolm, <<Iraq ... Turkey ... victory ... endless>> ... is not assured for any side, because the fight is, by definition, endless until exhaustion, unless the fight is truly about Saddam, in which case it ends when he dies of any cause. The situation is at best maintained, or the problem is smeared to encompass a bigger map, and then, one way or another, eventual exhaustion when folks forget what the fight is all about. Chugs, Jay

To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (39612)	10/15/2003 8:46:12 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 74559

Malcolm, The Great Powers (including Britain and the US) are already responsible for the present borders in that region. Is this a case of if at first you don't succeed Try Try again.. :o) That approach still leaves the Kurds and lesser known Assyrians in a jackpot. Interesting list though .. How do you divide the northern oil between Syria, Turkey and Iran.. or does only Turkey get in on that ? That'll prove stable :o) And why give the Saudis anything ? They can't handle what they have. You left out Kuwait BTW which is as pre-fab as Iraq. The administration's goals are an endless source of misery for the many Agree. Funny I had great hopes Bush would do a credible job, then came Iraq, I think Afghanistan was justified. regards Kastel