Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: okey who wrote (22351)	10/16/2003 2:52:36 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 39344

Not a paid shill for AQI, I am afraid. No real interest in AQI and I don't know their management. On the balance of it I side with them because the facts seem to speak to IMA Res. having some kind of knowledge before they staked. Apparently the data was in the Newmont files that enabled them. The patterns fits as well, as that is how many companies act. IMA Res. also said some exculpatory things a priori, which hit me strange, -- about this discovery -- i.e. "apparently not showing any signs of prior visitation by geologists or exploration people" -- or words to that effect in one of their releases. It seems that they may have been covering in that. I don't see why you accuse me of being partial to AQI. Those who follow what I say on this thread would know that I did not think much of AQI's pick of properties in Argentina and was baleful about their chances of developing what they have. No one would have mistaken me for being A@QI's friend. I am just calling it like I see it. For IMA Res. to prove that AQI is being malicious and injurious for the writing of the letter, they have to prove that others knew about it, and that this was done negligently and with intent of injury or carelessly by AQI. This will be hard to prove, especially since AQI might still be the injured party and thus had a right to act as it did on its own schedule. Their (AQI's) right of adjudication of the wrong, or investigation of the act, is not constrained by any condition of IMA Res. or their needs. EC<:-}