SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KonKilo who wrote (12474)10/16/2003 7:50:55 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793622
 
They really had to eat their words on the original Asner story. I was amazed when I read it, but knew Asner was pretty radical. Turns out not that radical.

Here is Mickey Kaus on his new bit, "NeoLiberalism." The last time they tried to means test Medicare, Congressmen were almost run out of their districts.
___________________________________

The quiet victory of 'neoliberalism:' At a breakfast in the spring of 1985, Paul Kirk, then chairman of the Democratic National Committee, suggested "means testing" big government benefit programs--in essence, shaving the benefits of the affluent--as a way to save money. Kirk was forced to eat his words by lunch. ("I should not have mentioned the subject of a means test.") ... We've come a long way. Now House and Senate conferees have reached a "basic philosophical consensus" to apply a type of a means test, based on income, to Part B of Medicare. Nobody has been forced to eat any words--yet. ... P.S.: "Means testing" was a key plank in the platform of "neoliberalism," the philosophy my old boss Charles Peters championed at the Washington Monthly. Today's news on Part B is but another example of why this neoliberal tendency, once exciting and heretical, is now less compelling than it once was: It's less compelling because it's won.
slate.msn.com



To: KonKilo who wrote (12474)10/16/2003 7:57:58 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793622
 
Well how about that. Ed Asner is not as radical as I thought. :0)

Good find ShiloCat!



To: KonKilo who wrote (12474)10/16/2003 8:12:54 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 793622
 
Brit Hume reported the Asner misquote 2 days ago, then had to retract yesterday. You'd think they'd do a little DD over there.

But I believed it when it first came out. Nothing Asner says would surprise me...



To: KonKilo who wrote (12474)10/16/2003 8:27:46 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793622
 
Many conservatives have asked the same question.

Stalin is one big damn mystery, I wonder why nobody has tried it?



To: KonKilo who wrote (12474)10/16/2003 11:17:04 AM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793622
 
I knew about the partial retraction, but the fact that Asner would like to play the leading role in a movie about Stalin isn't earth shattering........I think he'd do a great job.

It is this that I find most disturbing about the rabid left. This kind of mind set is frighteningly Stalin like.

Ed Asner: 'Hannity's next ... just like we went after Limbaugh'

M