Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (77601)	10/16/2003 4:14:38 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 82486

Damn you! Damn you, twice! I was saving that! Oh well...I guess you are right. The whole thing is so laughable!

To: The Philosopher who wrote (77601)	10/16/2003 4:25:58 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 82486

"Mojo's standard, if adopted by ... " You seem to have missed the entire point of making a claim regarding "freedom of conscience". Why am I not surprised.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (77601)	10/27/2003 2:00:34 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Mojo's standard, if adopted by the massage community, would mean that gays and lesbians couldn't get massages period. A gay couldn't be massaged by a male, because that might arouse him, and couln't be massaged by a woman, since that could arouse the woman. He could get massaged by a lesbian and she could get a massage from a gay man... In any case I don't think either Jewel or the hypothetical Mojo was saying that the standard had to be applied by everyone. Tim