SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (12572)10/16/2003 9:06:55 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793639
 
Power and Money!
__________________

Clark Drafters Seek a Spot in His Campaign
By Terry M. Neal
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Thursday, October 16, 2003; 12:00 AM

The thing about wild-eyed idealism is that it doesn't pay the bills.

When it came time to turn the movement to draft retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark to run for president into a nuts-and-bolts campaign, the usual dramas surfaced over power and money -- but because of the campaign's unusual genesis, the struggle for control of the campaign has some curious twists.

This sort of thing is not unique to the Clark campaign. Al Gore's campaign three years ago was riven with infighting and power plays. This year, Sen. John Kerry's camp has had its share of internal dramas. But the dynamics of the Clark campaign have been particularly difficult, in part because of the unique way it formed as an outgrowth of Internet activists interested in recruiting the person they saw as the best leader for the nation. The fact that Clark got in so late only raised the stakes to get it right from the start.

"This campaign is truly unique for a variety of reasons," Clark campaign communications director Matt Bennett said on Tuesday. "We're trying to start this up from a standing stop, eight months after everyone else. And on top of that, this is the first time anyone has tried to meld a national campaign onto an existing and very vibrant grass-roots organizing campaign that had sprung up without any help or input from the candidate."

This Is Where It Gets Tricky

When Clark announced his intention to run a few weeks ago, he cited the encouragement he received from the online draft movement as one of the factors that helped him make his decision.

The movement of bloggers and online activists was led by two groups, DraftClark04.com, based in Little Rock, Ark., which promised to have volunteers in place and ready to work for Clark in every state, and DraftWesleyClark.com, based in Washington, D.C., which generated nearly $2 million in pledges by early September.

But after Clark announced, the Internet activists had trouble melding with each other or with the professional campaign people, many of whom were veterans of the Clinton and Gore presidential campaigns. Initially, some of the Internet folks said they felt as though they were being shunted aside by people who understood the value of their product but not their value as human capital.

The leaders of DraftWesleyClark.com, John Hlinko and Josh Margulies, had said before Clark entered the race, that they would only take a salary if anything were left over after paying for expenses. (See my September 3 column.) This week, they said they were asking the Clark campaign for reimbursement for their work, and they acknowledged that the amount of their request -- which they would not reveal -- had generated a fair amount of dissension in the campaign.

But, the two men pointed out, Federal Election Commission rules prohibit organizations from turning over e-mail lists to campaigns for free, so they couldn't have given away their product even if they had wanted to. They said their lawyers were in negotiations with the campaign over "fair market value" for the e-mail list.

Problems such as these aside, the campaign was happy to report Wednesday that DraftWesleyClark.com had come through, converting about half of the $1.9 million in pledges into actual dollar contributions in the third quarter. In addition, Margulies, who has been hired by the campaign as a deputy spokesman, predicted that about 70 percent of the total $3.5 million raised by the campaign in the previous quarter came from Internet contributions.

"Yes, there were some real problems in the beginning," Margulies said. "But that's all yesterday. We're all really plugged in and integrated with the campaign in general. For all that to happen in less than a month is astonishing. I've seen a lot of campaigns where the egos last for 14 months, and that's not happening here."

No Unanimous Consent on That Issue

Not all of the Internet activists who worked on the draft Clark movement are so happy.

Stirling Newberry, a Lowell, Mass., activist who helped start or run a number of pro-Clark Web sites, including DraftClark.com, has been the most vocal. In a blunt (his critics say bitter) "Open Letter to the Clark Movement", Newberry predicted that the dual failures of the Internet-based movement and the professional campaign leadership will lead to the candidate's political demise.

"Many people intimately connected with the draft movement failed Clark. They failed him by inflating their accomplishments, and working to fragment the movement, so that they could get jobs in the campaign. Unfortunately, this has proven, as it always was, to be a mistake. The flaw was this: by lying about their accomplishments, it undercut the very credibility of the people who were fighting for the Draft Movement. As a result the insiders prevailed, and now the Draft movement is on the outside looking in -- with its most vocal supporter resigning from the campaign, and the positions of others left in doubt -- and its most eloquent spokespeople cut out of the process entirely."

Donnie Fowler left his job as Clark's campaign manager last week, saying Clark was more focused on wooing Washington insiders than the grass-roots activists who made his candidacy possible in the first place. (See Post story.)

Fowler, Newberry said, was the only person who could harness the energy and activism of the grass-roots and meld them into the professional campaign operation. The evidence of the campaign's inability to do that, he said, can be seen by the lagging effort to put together professional operations in key states, such as Iowa and New Hampshire.

Some of those inside the campaign, from both the volunteer Internet side and the professional side, characterized Newberry as a professional complainer. While they acknowledged a tough start, they said the two sides were coming together to form a strong organization. For example, Hlinko has been hired to run Internet strategy. He answers directly to the campaign chairman Eli Segal rather than to the communications director.

"I like Stirling, and I think he's a smart guy," Hlinko said. "But in this case, I just think he's wrong. He hasn't really been here. I look around the office and I see draft people all around me. Things are a lot better than he perceives it. The people who are seeing it close up are not echoing that sentiment. Not to disparage the guy, but he's just a little over the top."
washingtonpost.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (12572)10/16/2003 9:18:18 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793639
 
Money, money, money!
_________________________________

'Bundling' contributions pays for Bush campaign

By Jim Drinkard and Laurence McQuillan, USA TODAY

Just about every person in South Dakota who has donated $1,000 or more to President Bush's re-election campaign is in Tom Everist's pocket PC.

Tom Everist, far left, a Board members of Sioux Falls-based Raven Industries, has raised more than $150,000 for Bush.
Sioux Falls, S.D., Argus Leader

As a result, Everist, a wealthy businessman from Sioux Falls, is well on his way to becoming one of Bush's elite Rangers — people who have raised at least $200,000 for the campaign by collecting checks of no more than $2,000 each from their friends, family and business associates. (Related link: Bush's 'Rangers')

"I've met all these people and figured out their potential for strong support for George Bush," Everist says.

Everist, 53, is part of a network of aggressive money raisers around the country that forms the backbone of the Bush money machine. From May 16, when fundraising began, through Sept. 30, the campaign amassed $83.9 million — meaning people like Everist have raised close to $25,000 an hour, around the clock, seven days a week.

In totals released Tuesday, 100 Bush fundraisers had achieved Ranger status by Sept. 30, the end of the third quarter. Another 185 were designated "Pioneers" for hitting the $100,000 mark. Everist, who topped $100,000 by June 30, the end of the second quarter, has since raised more than $50,000 in a push to become a Ranger.

Bush collected $1.75 million at two more fundraising events Wednesday in California on the way to a goal of about $170 million. The money will pay for staff — 130 people so far, and growing — and for an extensive advertising campaign next year.

Bush's elite fundraisers span the worlds of finance, real estate, industry and politics. The common denominator: each is wealthy and has access to others with fortunes. With few exceptions, they are white, male and over 50.

The Rangers include:

•William DeWitt Jr. of Cincinnati, head of an investment firm and co-owner of the St. Louis Cardinals.

•Billionaire Richard Egan of Hopkinton, Mass., founder of EMC Corp., which makes computer data storage units. He is the president's former ambassador to Ireland. His sons Christopher and Michael also are Rangers.

•Art dealer Frank Fowler of Lookout Mountain, Tenn., who represents the work of American artist Andrew Wyeth.

•Alex Spanos of Stockton, Calif., a real estate developer and owner of the San Diego Chargers.

The practice of rounding up contributions from your friends is known as "bundling." And under a campaign-finance law that took effect last November, those who do it, in both parties, are the new kings of political money. "This is the wave of the future," says Scott Reed, a Republican political strategist and manager of Bob Dole's 1996 presidential campaign.

The law bars the national parties from collecting huge corporate, union and individual donations, so people who can round up lots of smaller checks from their friends and business associates have become the most sought-after volunteers in politics. The new maximum contribution to a presidential candidate is $2,000 for the primaries. (The general election is financed by the government.) It takes a lot of individual contributions to fuel today's advertising-intensive campaigns.

"The first primary is the race for the best bundlers," says David Jones, a Democratic fundraising consultant.

Jobs, influence and barbecues

Fundraising professionals say that when it comes to soliciting contributions of $2,000, one factor is paramount: who is asking.

"First and foremost, people give because the right person asks them to. It's somebody they have a relationship with from a business or social or political perspective," Jones says. CEOs make the best bundlers, experts say, because they can tap executives who work for them along with vendors and contractors who sell to them.

"They will feel they need to give for business reasons," Jones says. "It almost doesn't matter who the candidate is."

"In today's business, there is a lot of, 'If you can help me, I can help you on your projects', " Reed says. "A lot of horse trading goes on."

Motives for becoming a bundler can include the possibility of increased influence on government policy and consideration for appointment to ambassadorships and other government posts. More than 60 of Bush's 241 Pioneers in the 2000 campaign went on to receive appointive positions, says Craig McDonald of Texans for Public Justice, a group that has tracked Bush's fundraising.

"There are going to have to be a bunch of new U.S. ambassadors, and you might as well be in the running," says one of Bush's fundraisers, who declined to allow his name to be used for fear he would hurt his chances of being chosen.

Others, such as Everist, take on the job of fundraising because of longstanding party loyalty. Still others do it out of friendship with the candidate or the chance to feel part of the power elite. Bush's biggest fundraisers have been invited to Crawford, Texas, for barbecues with the president.

In a deposition given in connection with a court challenge to the new campaign-finance law, Bush fundraiser Jack Oliver described how the campaign tapped a list of people who had attended Harvard Business School with Bush. The campaign also sought help from several industries, including investment, banking, insurance, oil, airlines and the arts.

Those industries apparently were eager to get credit with the campaign for their contributions. Documents disclosed in the campaign-finance case included a memo from Tom Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, a trade group for electric utilities.

In it, he reminded industry colleagues of the importance of including his tracking number, 1178, on their checks to the Bush campaign, to "ensure that our industry is credited, and that your progress is listed among the other business/industry sectors."

The watchdog group Common Cause has identified 14 Pioneers from 2000 whose business interests benefited from Bush administration decisions, primarily through the easing of federal regulations. Those fundraisers "prospered in their investment in the 2000 campaign," charged the group, which supports reform of the public finance system for presidential campaigns. Bush's ability to raise large amounts has allowed him to opt out of that system for the primaries.

In a deposition for the court case, Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who sponsored the campaign-finance law, expressed concern that bundling might be the next loophole in the law he helped write. It "could conceivably begin to recreate something that would begin to look like" the old system in which the parties could collect unlimited donations from a person or group, he said.

Making 'the ask'

Everist fits the description of an ideal bundler.

He built up a fourth-generation family business that quarries stone and sells ready-mix concrete, in South Dakota and across the country. His company helped build Washington's Dulles International Airport and has operations throughout the Midwest and West. He has made connections as head of the state Chamber of Commerce, a member of the local hospital board of directors and a Sioux Falls economic-development board, as well as from his involvement in Republican politics. His wife, Barbara, was the state Senate majority leader.

When the Bush campaign's national finance chairman, Mercer Reynolds, called him earlier this year with a recruiting pitch, Everist didn't jump at it. "This is a small state, and it's hard to make much of an impact on national races," he says. "There is a feeling here that our dollars do more good in local and state races."

But Reynolds — who himself bundled upward of $600,000 for Bush's 2000 campaign — ultimately won by appealing to Everist's admiration for the president.

"I went through my list of people who I figured would be inclined to help out," Everist says. "I called them and said 'I'm asking you to join Barb and myself to support the president with early money.' I got 80% to 90% of the people I called to say 'yes' " to a contribution of $1,000 or $2,000, he says.

He did it by calling people such as Mark Griffin, the president of a regional chain of 25 drugstores that sell everything from prescriptions to lawn mowers. The two have served on boards and gone to the same fundraisers. But Griffin says he's not a diehard Republican. Indeed, Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota, the Senate's Democratic leader, once filmed political ads in Griffin's office.

"I'm more of a policy person," Griffin says. He is especially concerned about how Congress writes a prescription-drug benefit for Medicare beneficiaries. He gave $2,000. He says he felt a responsibility to support the president.

Another entry in Everist's database is Steve Kirby, an investor and former lieutenant governor of the state. Everist called him and asked for a contribution, as Kirby had done to Everist on occasion.

"We essentially trade checks, and it was his turn to call me," Kirby says. Loyal Republicans, he and his wife, Suzette, each gave $2,000.

Other political contacts Everist tapped included South Dakota Gov. Michael Rounds and his wife, Jean, who gave $2,000 apiece. Former congressman John Thune, now a Washington lobbyist, gave $1,000 and hosted a fundraising reception at his Sioux Falls home.

Everist once served on the board of Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health System, the city's main hospital; his wife is currently on the board. That was the connection for at least $7,000 in contributions from hospital CEO Kelby Krabbenhoft, his wife, Heidi, and surgeons Gary Timmerman and John Vanderwoude.

There are personal friends as well, such as Mark Graham, owner of a packaging company, and his wife, Pat, whose children carpooled with the Everists. Another friend is Larry Ness, president of First Dakota National Bank. "Tom called and said, 'Our goal is $100,000, and I want to get it over and done with. Help us out here,' " Ness recalls. "So I said yes."

"Tom is involved in nearly everything in the community and is very generous," Thune says. "He can ask people because he is the first person people come to for support for community or civic or political fundraising projects. He knows the people who are likely to be supportive, and he's the kind of person who can make the ask."

Turning donors into fundraisers

Although Bush has raised bundling to a new level, he's not the only one to practice it. Many Democratic candidates for president are seeking to emulate Bush's model.

"Every fundraising event I have had has yielded other people who will do fundraising events, and that's what you seek to do," Rep. Richard Gephardt, D-Mo., says. "It's like a giant Tupperware party."

Part of the challenge is to convert big-money donors into big-money raisers, and it's not always a sure bet. "There's not always a correlation between somebody who can write you a $50,000 check and someone who can raise 25 $2,000 checks," Gephardt says. "That's a very different human skill."

Other Democrats also are working hard at bundling donations.

•Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts has created a "Hall of Fame" designation for his $100,000 bundlers. The campaign says there are about 10 members of the group so far, concentrated in Massachusetts, but he declines to disclose their names.

•Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor, has benefited from supporters who can leverage their extensive contacts into campaign donations. Actor-director Rob Reiner raised $125,000 for Dean at an event at his house in Los Angeles on June 18.

•Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina takes advantage of his connections as a plaintiff's lawyer through chief fundraiser Fred Baron, whose Dallas law firm has given heavily to the campaign. Baron's network is a wide one because he headed the Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

The Democratic and Republican parties are watching the process closely. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee compared its 200,000-name donor list to a database of the wealthiest 5% of Americans and found one-fourth of the names matched.

The average contribution from those on the list? Forty-two dollars. "We're asking them for the wrong amount of money," says executive director Andrew Grossman. Asking for more may require a personal touch — as the Bush campaign already has shown.

usatoday.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (12572)10/16/2003 10:03:16 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793639
 
No coverage in Sacramento. One of the reason things got so bad.
_____________________________

Media Savvy: State's TV stations coming back Capitol -- but for how long?
By J. Freedom du Lac -- Bee Pop Culture Writer -

"I'll be back" isn't just Arnold Schwarzenegger's most famous movie mantra.

It's also what TV stations throughout California are suddenly saying about Sacramento.

With Schwarzenegger about to take office here, the Capitol bureau -- a concept that's been dormant for 15 years among the state's TV stations and hasn't been embraced en masse since Ronald Reagan was governor -- appears to be on the verge of at least a temporary resurrection.

No fewer than eight stations in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and Fresno are making plans to set up shop at the Capitol, which hasn't seen such a prominent out-of-town TV presence since San Francisco's KRON pulled out in 1988.

"I'm really excited to be reversing that trend," says Dan Rosenheim, the top news boss at San Francisco's CBS affiliate, KPIX.

Says Bob Long, Rosenheim's counterpart at KNBC in Los Angeles: "Sacramento is where the story is."

He adds with a laugh: "I expect we'll spend more time there than the governor-elect will."

That's for now, perhaps, as Schwarzenegger might govern as much from Los Angeles as he does from the capital city.

But don't bet on the TV stations ultimately outlasting him in Sacramento.

The cost of operating a Capitol bureau "would approach $1 million a year," Long says -- and it was the high price that led to TV's pullout in the first place, starting in the 1970s.

That and the consultant-driven notion that the pricey political coverage was dulling up the increasingly tabloid-style newscasts anyway.

So while the station suits are saying all the right things -- that political stories can be visually compelling, that they're committed to covering state government (even if studies have shown that they're not) and so on -- some of them are already hedging.

"Clearly, we'll need to be in Sacramento for an indefinite amount of time," Long says. "But I don't know that people are going to sign long-term leases."

Says Stacy Owen, news director at San Francisco's independent KRON, which hasn't yet confirmed its Capitol bureau plans: "The reality is, I don't know that we'd still be up there in six months.

"(Schwarzenegger) made a very clear list of 10 things he was going to do in his first 100 days. It's part of our job to hold him to that. I've got to tell you, though, after the first 100 days, I think the interest is going to wane."

Or will it?

Kevin Keeshan, the vice president for news at San Francisco's KGO, predicts that people will remain keenly interested in the Capitol for at least the next "three to five years."

"I don't see this going away," he says -- though he won't say specifically how long KGO plans to operate a Sacramento bureau.

Nor will Rosenheim of KPIX. But, Rosenheim says: "We don't see opening this bureau as a temporary thing. We're not saying: 'Let's do it for three months and then bail.' "

KPIX, he says, will operate its bureau jointly with KCBS, the CBS affiliate from Los Angeles. Each Viacom-owned station will send a reporter and photographer to Sacramento to open a satellite bureau in the building that houses the UPN affiliate, KMAX -- another Viacom property.

Similar setups -- with stations that share ownership also sharing personnel, equipment and leased space -- are in the works for the ABC-owned-and-operated affiliates from the Los Angeles (KABC), San Francisco (KGO) and Fresno (KFSN) markets, and the NBC-owned stations in the Los Angeles (KNBC), San Francisco (KNTV) and San Diego (KNSD) markets.

The stations' return is great news to Barbara O'Connor, director of the Institute for the Study of Politics and Media at California State University, Sacramento.

After all, more contextual coverage of government means a more-informed electorate.

But, O'Connor says, the stations need to stick around for more than a few months.

"Are you going to be here a year from now when we take roll?" she says. "And if not, why bother?"

Likewise if you're coming just to cover a celebrity, says Steve Mallory, a former Capitol reporter for KNBC.

"It's wonderful what's happening, but it's sad that they're coming for the wrong reason," says Mallory, who runs Capitol Television News Service, which syndicates political stories to TV stations around the state. "They should be here to cover important news. But they're coming to cover a movie star."

Says KRON's Owen: "We're all going to have to keep our eye on the ball and cover the issues, and not just the superstar in the Capitol. What I don't want to be is part of some version of political paparazzi, which I think is what's in danger of happening."

Of course, for all of Schwarzenegger's star power -- and all the talk about how Californians have never been more interested in government -- the reality is that people's attention spans are as short as ever.

At least in the media world.

Though Schwarzenegger has yet to take office, he's apparently been bumped down a notch on the news wheel in the southern half of the state by a grocery workers strike.

"Now people can't get their groceries," says Fred D'Ambrosi, news director at San Diego's CBS station, KFMB. "That's kind of pushed state government off the lead story."

sacbee.com