Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (77620)	10/16/2003 7:21:16 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Your declarations are also unfounded. If a woman feels uncomfortable because the guys she works with are saying or doing things in her presence that gets them aroused she has the right to object to that behavior" BUT SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT (on the basis that some people harm her) TO INSIST THAT ALL MALES (MOST OF WHOM ARE INNOCENT) DO NOT WORK WITH HER BUT ARE SENT TO AN ALL-MALE COMPANY! And she at least had the complaint of objectionable behaviour! Inadvertent arousal on a massage table is not objectionable and it causes no harm to anyone!! I gave you a chance to list your harms and you walked back into your insult mode (I wonder why! :-)) So be it!! ;-)