Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (12581)	10/16/2003 8:52:02 PM
From: KyrosL	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793917

KLP, there are numerous examples if you follow the reports about the costs of reconstruction. Every time I read about them, my hair stands on end. Here is the most recent. It involves gasoline: chron.com Since in about a year Iraq will be producing all the gas it needs and more at a cost well below 20 cents a gallon, it's a no brainer swapping some of that future production for current deliveries for practically zero cost (just the carrying cost of the futures position). But, of course, in this case, there will not be much of anything for Halliburton... Another outrage is the advertised cost for adding 2000 MW of electric capacity. All the estimates I saw are for $2 billion or more and involve super efficient brand new electric generation stations. This at the time when used, older, less efficient natural gas-fired generators (natural gas is practically free in Iraq and is mostly flared off as a byproduct of oil production) can be had for almost nothing in the US and Western Europe. A third general problem is the heavy involvement of foreign (mostly US) consultants in the rebuilding process -- they all come with armed imported guards too. They are very expensive, don't know the country and the existing infrastructure, and are the main reason for cost bloat. Saddam did his rebuilding after Gulf I practically on a shoestring and in record time. He used exclusively Iraqis, who are a pretty resourceful and relatively well educated people. Now we got a swarm of foreign consultants (many from Halliburton's consulting arm KBR), who, no matter how lowly, are getting paid six figure salaries -- understandably, given the risk. Each one of these salaries can pay for hundreds of Iraqis, many of them University educated, hanging around US army compounds, begging for jobs.