Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (77647)	10/16/2003 9:13:56 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Let us get something straight--AGAIN: I set the cliet hypothesis as a normal client going for a massage. When I said the client considered his/her arousal not inappropriate or harmful or damaging, it was on the basis that Moho or his peers have not been unethical in the session. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, JEWELS?? IF Moho is NOT upright, then we are dealing with sexual misconduct. Do you understand the difference? Now, only someone extremely troubled and hung-up would feel harmed by their own arousal! Lets be real! Do you feel harmed when you masturbate?! When you admire a girl on the street dressed all sexy and inviting?! So I hypothesized a normal client--one who does not want to control Moho's thoughts...he just wants a bloody massage and a receipt when it is done. My client's name is EveryMan because he represents 99.9 % of clients. Your therapist is named Moho because he is an oddity who represents himself. It is doubtful if anyone on this thread has ever encountered a therapist so hung-up on sex that he would venture to segregation in order to pig-out in his self-indulgence. "It is a fact that mojo is conservative and provides a service to conservative people who find being sexualized on a massage therapists table unwelcome, uncomfortable, a violation of their personal ethics, and something to be avoided when they have an option. Mojo provides them that option, and is hurting no one in the process. For some reason that offends you ..." It doesn't offend me at all when "conservative people who find being sexualized on a massage therapists table unwelcome, uncomfortable, a violation of their personal ethics" are offered an alternative. Everybody knows we have been talking about people who were referred away from you because they did not fit YOUR CRITERIA. And you now have the shame to throw out the above paragraph after a month of your support of bigotry? Yeah..right?? I gave you 9 feet of rope and you stole 69 feet of it! Have you seen the Chaplan? :-)