Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (2396)	10/17/2003 11:38:38 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22250

You failed to address the balance of my post and I wonder why. As I've suggested, your opinions and theories are just that. It is quite easy for the student of history, the commentator and the author, to come up with other theories diametrically opposite or directed against other groups. I think your post to me suggests that you agree. Given all that, I wonder whether you see how the cause of peace and stability in the world is hurt by picking a target, a scapegoat, and then finding evidence to support the theory that the scapegoat is to blame. It might the proponent of the theory "feel better." It might cast "suspicions" or accusations away from the proponent. However, it doesn't do any good to the greater good and to social conscience. Clearly, a student of history such as yourself might be better served to review history, the facts and the commentary, as well as the commentary upon commentary, and then right a bit more objectively. Perhaps, this could lead to others learning from a reasoned history, rather than just looking for blame and pointing fingers. rrufff