SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MLNM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: software salesperson who wrote (1897)10/17/2003 7:47:12 AM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3044
 
Thanks Sales,

That is an excellent set of notes on the MLNM presentation at analyst day.

You caught most of the comments that interested me. Later I will compare my notes and add some comments if I find any interesting variances.

ij



To: software salesperson who wrote (1897)10/17/2003 9:50:03 AM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3044
 
And here is GS's take today:

<details
Millennium is on track to transition from a research driven company to a company with
two marketed products and a broad pipeline. Management plans to shift more speculative
research expenses to market driven development expenses. As most of its corporate
partnerships reach completion in 2003, the research devoted to collaborative projects
should decline. We view MLNM as attractive for long&#8722;term investors based on the
momentum from the launch of Velcade, good cash position, and a growing pipeline.
However, the lack of earnings may increase the volatility of Millennium shares.
Millennium shares have significantly outperformed the market, appreciating 125% year to
date versus 19% for S&P 500 and 42% for the AMEX Biotech Index.
1. REITERATED GOAL OF PROFITABILITY IN 2006
During the analyst meeting yesterday, management reiterated the goal of achieving
profitability in 2006 without relying on additional FDA approvals of new products and
indications. Management indicated that the ongoing restructuring should result in
$225&#8722;250MM in charges, including $175MM&#8722;200MM in 2003. Approximately 1/3 of
the charges will be non&#8722;cash and the other 2/3 cash. By focusing the R&D programs,
management expects to reduce R&D expenses by 20%. SG&A expenses, however, are
expected to increase about 10&#8722;20% post&#8722;restructuring due to increased marketing and
sales efforts on Velcade and Integrilin. The company expects to have over $800MM in
cash at the end of 2003, which should be sufficient to support operations until
profitability.
2. AGGRESSIVE MARKETING PROGRAM TO GROW INTEGRILIN
Sales growth for Integrilin has primarily been achieved by gaining market share versus
Merck’s Aggrastat and Eli Lilly/Johnson & Johnson’s Reopro. In August 2003, Integrilin
achieved over 70% patient share in the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor market. At the analyst meeting
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. October 17, 2003
management reiterated its goal of $500MM in Integrilin sales by 2005, driving earlier use of
Integrilin in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and expanding the use in the
catheterization lab.
In the U.S., approximately 1.3MM patients present with symptoms of ACS and 0.9MM patients
undergo diagnostic catheterization each year. The early use of Integrilin soon after presentation
represents a $1B potential. Millennium is conducting the CRUSADE registry in order to improved
adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. To date, the trial has enrolled
over 70,000 patients. Based on the analysis of 49,378 patients, early use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
resulted in 43% reduction (p\<0.0001) of in&#8722;hospital mortality. The sales force has been
expanded to promote Integrilin, including the CRUSADE data to high admitting office&#8722;based
cardiologists, emergency physicians, and decision makers in the coronary care units and other
locations. From Q2/02&#8722;Q1/03, the number of hospitals in the top 10% of overall adherence to
the ACC/AHA guidelines increased by 16%. Millennium is plans to start a prospectively designed
trial on early use in 2004.
Of the 750,000 patients that undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in the U.S. each
year, only 41% are treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Millennium is conducting additional trials
in order to increase the use of Integrilin for PCI. The studies are designed to differentiate
Integrilin from competitive products, such as Angiomax and heparin, and to support the use of
stents. The PROTECT trial is enrolling high&#8722;risk PCI patients to Integrilin plus heparin/low
molecular weight heparin versus Angiomax alone. The EVENT trial is a registry of outcomes of
patients treated with bare metal/drug eluting stents with or without Integrilin.
3. VELCADE LAUNCH AHEAD OF EXPECTATIONS
Millennium received FDA approval of Velcade for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma on May
13, 2003. Due to the faster than expected adoption, management raised 2003 guidance from
$25&#8722;30MM to over $50MM on October 15, 2003. Management noted that physicians have been
quick to adopt Velcade due to the lack of alternative treatment for multiple myeloma patients that
have failed multiple therapies. On September 26, 2003, Millennium was notified by the Center
for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that Velcade received pass&#8722;through status for
Medicare reimbursement effective October 1, 2003. Starting on January 1, 2004, and retroactive
to the effective date, Velcade will be reimbursed under the hospital outpatient prospective
payment system.
In January 2003, Millennium filed a marketing application for Velcade in Europe. Approval is
expected in early 2004. The company will continue regulatory interaction in Europe until
marketing approval, which should occur in H1/04. Thereafter, the regulatory responsibility will be
transferred to its partner, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). JNJ will be responsible for
commercialization outside of the United States and pay royalties to Millennium. We speculate that
the royalty rate is at least 20% initially. The royalty rate increases with higher sales levels. JNJ has
approximately 300 sales representatives to promote Eprex for anemia and other cancer products
in Europe.
4. STUDIES TO EXPAND THE APPLICATIONS OF VELCADE OPPORTUNITY
a. APEX trial on track. Millennium has enrolled over 600 patients in a multi&#8722;center Phase III
(APEX) trial of Velcade. The study includes 600 patients with advanced multiple myeloma who
have relapsed or are refractory after 1&#8722;3 prior therapies. They will be treated with Velcade or
high&#8722;dose dexamethane for 38 weeks. Patients who progress while on high&#8722;dose dexamethane
will be allowed to switch to open label Velcade therapy. The primary endpoint is time&#8722;to&#8722;tumor
progression (TTP), which may include (1) a 25% increase in serum/urine M&#8722;protein relative to
baseline in nonresponders or relative to nadir in patients with confirmed responses, (2) appearance
of a new bony lesion, or (3) new hypercalcemia. TTP for dexamethane alone is expected to be 6
to 9 months in the patient population being studied. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit,
quality of life, survival, and response rate (both tumor and M&#8722;protein levels). Results should be
available in 2004.
b. Velcade in solid tumors. Millennium is conducting Phase II trials of Velcade for non&#8722;small cell
lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer. In the NSCLC trial, patients will be treated with
Goldman Sachs Global Equity Research 2
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. October 17, 2003
Velcade alone or in combination with docetaxel. Patients with colorectal cancer will be treated
with Velcade and irinotecan or Velcade alone. Additional trials are ongoing in ovarian, renal cell,
breast, pancreatic and prostate cancers. In H2/03, Millennium expects to make go/no&#8722;go
decisions on 2 solid tumor cancers. Data from Phase I and II trials of Velcade in solid tumors will
be presented at ASCO in May 2004.
c. Velcade in hematological cancers. In July 2003, Millennium initiated a Phase II trial of Velcade
monotherapy in 152 mantle cell lymphoma patients who have failed one or two prior therapies.
Primary endpoints include time to progression, response rate, duration of response and overall
survival. Millennium presented positive Phase I data in May 2003. In 11 patients with mantle cell
lymphoma, four had partial responses (including two with major partial responses) and two had
stable disease. Millennium is also performing a Phase II study of Velcade in combination with
Rituxan for non&#8722; Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Data are expected in 2004. There are about 300,000
cases of non&#8722;Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 55,000 new cases per year in the US. While Rituxan and
chemotherapy are standard of care, Velcade could have a place as a therapy for refractory patients
which represents over $300MM potential.
5. UPDATE ON EARLY STAGE PIPELINE
a. MLN2704. On October 9, 2003, Millennium initiated a Phase I/II trial to determine the
biological activity of MLN2704 in prostate cancer. MLN2704 is a monoclonal antibody
conjugated to chemotherapeutic agent.
b. MLN&#8722;518. Phase I trials are ongoing in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Millennium expects to
have data available internally in H2/03 and make a go/no&#8722;go decision on Phase II trials.
MLN&#8722;518 is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
c. MLN1202. On October 14, 2003, Millennium initiated a Phase II trial of MLN1202 in
rheumatoid arthritis. MLN1202 is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CCR2
chemokine receptor on monocytes, macrophages and T&#8722; cells.
6. Q3 RESULTS: LOSS OF $0.10, $0.17 BETTER ON MILESTONE FEE
Millennium’s Q3 loss of $0.10 was $0.17 better than our estimate, mainly due to a milestone fee
from JNJ. Worldwide sales of Integrilin and Velcade were slightly higher than our forecasts.
Expenses were lower than expected.
a. INTEGRILIN: Worldwide Integrilin sales of $79MM were $2MM above our estimate of
$77MM. The reported sales included domestic sales of approximately $72MM and international
sales of approximately $6MM. Management estimated that inventory levels were lower than the
1.3&#8722;1.4 months seen at yearend 2002. The ’normal’ inventory range is 1.0&#8722;1.5 months. There
was a 5.2% price increase on 9/29/03.
b. VELCADE: Velcade sales of $23MM were $3MM higher than our estimate of $20MM. On
October 7, we raised our Q3/03 Velcade sales forecasts to $8 million from $20 million. Initial
demand has been strong as patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma do not have any
other treatment options. Management indicated that there is minimal inventory at wholesalers.
c. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE REVENUES: Revenues from corporate partners were $74MM,
$25MM higher than our estimate due to a milestone payment from JNJ after Millennium
completed enrolling 612 patients in the Phase III APEX trial of Velcade in multiple myeloma.
d. OTHER INCOME: Net other income of $6MM was $1MM lower than our estimate due to
higher than expected interest expense.
e. EXPENSES: R&D and SG&A expenses were $17MM and $8MM below our estimates,
respectively. Gross margin of 83% was 60 basis points higher than our forecast.
7. REVISED 2003 AND 2004 LOSS ESTIMATE BASED ON LOWER EXPENSES
Based on the outperformance in Q3/03, we have raised our 2003 worldwide Integrilin sales
Goldman Sachs Global Equity Research 3
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. October 17, 2003
forecast to $339MM (+ 12% from 2002) from $336MM and our Velcade forecast to $57MM
from $54MM. We maintain our forecast for gross margins of 83%. However, due to the
restructuring of the R&D programs starting in Q2/03, we have reduced our 2003 estimate to
$506MM from $540MM. We also lowered our SG&A expenses to $176MM from $194MM.
The net effect was a $0.18 revision to our 2003 loss estimate to $0.82 from $1.00.
For 2004, we maintain our forecast for Velcade sales of $190MM (+233% from 2003), and
worldwide Integrilin sales of $338MM (flat with 2003), and gross margin of 83%. We lowered
R&D expenses to $422MM from $501MM and our SG&A expenses to $177MM from
$210MM. The net effect was a $0.11 revision to our 2004 loss estimate to $0.50 from $0.61.
Changes to our 2003 and 2004 quarterly estimates are as follows:
Old New Change
====== ====== =======
Q1/03A (0.34) (0.34) 0.00
Q2/03A (0.07) (0.07) 0.00
Q3/03A (0.10) (0.10) 0.00
Q4/03E (0.32) (0.30) 0.02
2003E (1.00) (0.82) 0.18
Q1/04E (0.24) (0.23) 0.01
Q2/04E (0.20) (0.05) 0.15
Q3/04E (0.17) (0.14) 0.03
Q4/04E 0.00 (0.09) (0.09)
2004E (0.61) (0.50) 0.11>

quid



To: software salesperson who wrote (1897)10/19/2003 8:52:06 PM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL  Respond to of 3044
 
>> my insertions
** important slides Part I or II + slide number (Eg. ** I 6 refers to slide six in Part One of the presentation)

10/16/03 Analyst Day notes

Mark Levin

more than 250 salespeople for V and I

V indications- - mm, nhl, solid tumors, ra, stroke

I will be $ 500 m + product; will begin new trial for early use acs

3 key pathways where mlnm has expertise: proteasome inhibition; cell trafficking; cell signaling - - want to leverage these skills

crucial to p 1 / p 2 portfolio mgmt. is using pathways, imaging and biomarkers to rule in/ out early stage candidates

p 2/ p 3- - need operational excellence

there will be more proteasome products

see being at level of top 2 biotech companies by 2011

10 molecules in clinic- - 2 approved products; 8 candidates

Bob Tepper

commercial products focus: V - - cancer, ra, stroke; I - - early acs

pipeline now divided into high priority:

2704 - - prostate

944 - - solid tumors
>> an exciting and unique compound

518 - - aml, glioblastoma; studying ITD biomarker found in 30% of aml patients

1202 - - ra, ms, restenosis

and lower priority:

02 - - ibd

591 - - prostate

519 - - various proteasome inhibitors

576 - - solid tumors

** I 32

differentiating approach: wants to use molecular pathway expertise on unprecedented targets with precedented pathways

areas of expertise to be leveraged, i.e. common mechanisms across multiple therapeutic areas:

chemokine receptors - - 1202 + preclinical
>> moved from PI to PII in 10 months and the investigators are enthusiastic

rtks - - 518 + preclinical

proteasome - - V, 519 + preclinical

stks - - preclinical

integrins - - I, 02

** I 36

has over 20 ongoing discovery programs that will generate 2 development candidates each year into clinic + will expand indications for both approved drugs and existing clinical candidates

making go/no go decisions earlier based on proof of concept

90% of r&d projects use genomic strategies

bio-marker driven clinical development

1st q & a

1. are you aware of a proteasome inhibitor being tested in hiv and do you see potential for V in hiv? - - has existing effort with V in infectious diseases
>> We are trying to decide what other areas to test Velcade and HIV is on the radar screen.

2. how is morale after layoff? - - agile, resilient, upfront with employees; will be using a revitalization team for a year
>> It has been a tough 9 months

3. 90% of pipeline came from acquisitions. Will there be more internally generated molecules in next 10 years? - - over next several years, there will be more genomics ?based targets; took many years to set up infrastructure; will be generating small molecules in chemokine receptor areas in next few years

4. why did 2704 leapfrog 591? - - based on pk and tolerability

5. you will need manufacturing capability for some of your high priority candidates. will you build or partner? - - happy with contractors; will not build; will look for partners with commercial and manufacturing capabilities in ex US market deal while retaining US rights

6. when does I patent expire? - - 2014

7. what is your role in personalized medicine? - - biomarkers and pathways; also, fda is very interested in personalized medicine; mlnm has been brought in to teach fda about them; fda wants to know how they should be regulated; fda wants personalized medicine tests for all drugs

8. what?s been successful in genomics? - - known pathways and streamlines entire process

9. is ccr2 in ra an example of an unprecedented target with a precedented pathway? - - yes; but not sure if ra is right disease; others to be studied include ms and restenosis

10. how has 2704 safety been demonstrated? - - few adverse events

11. how do you know that the 2704 conjugate isn?t dislodged prior to getting to target tissue? - - 4 pk measures

12. a question was raised about 2704 and seattle genetics, but the end of the question and the answer was cut off

13. a question was raised about the economics of using genomics for more efficient trials vs. smaller markets, but the answer was cut off

14. dna status of 02? - - had an efficacy signal; still discussing

15. why did psma and ccr2 move so quickly in clinic? - - good results

16. why did you terminate drugs that you had recently put in clinic? - - proud of that

David Schenkein - - V

** II 3

EU regulatory process on schedule; technology transfer with OBI product supply established in EU; global filing plan established for ROW

** II 10

** II 11

>> 25 MM trial ongoing

Accrued p 3 apex trial - - 600 patients; 340 in crossover trial

Mlnm ?sponsored p 2 studies:

Mantel cell lymphoma- - 6% of all lymphomas: - - V alone
** II 19

Nsclc - - V alone or V + docetaxel

Colorectal - - V alone or V + irinotecan

Has seen activity in follicular and sll/cll lymphomas

P 1 ovarian cancer - - V + carboplatin - - 67% response rate

Data to be presented:

Ash 2003 - - mm combo, mm frontline,mm duration, nhl, safety updates

Asco 2004 - -all of the above + solid tumors p1 and p 2

Ash 2004 - - same as ash 2003

V marketing: consistent across geographic regions;reimbursement process on track; has medicare pass-through status for outpatient use

Bob Terifay - - I

How to expand I use in cath lab? - - questions Angiomax?s replace 2 study results, e.g. excluded all high-risk patients, encouraged inappropriate uses of heparin and overly high doses of I to elderly

Says A has had little impact on gp iib-iiia inhibitor market

gp inhibitors grew since intro of A

A has 9% share, which includes combo with gp inhibitors

Starting 2 competitive studies:

Protect - - a high risk angioplasty study; I with heparin vs A; already initiated

Remove - - I vs. I with heparin in elective PCI; to start in early ?04

Starting 2 new trials in new settings:

Titan -- I for stemi; early treatment vs. at time of primary angioplasty; already initiated

Event - - bare metal or drug-eluting stents with and without gp inhibitors; hopes to show that gp inhibitors are still necessary to prevent thrombotic events regardless as to type of device used; to start in early ?04

Grow I in early use setting by educating in acc/aha guidelines

Planning new p 3 early non ste acs - - 1.3 m patient potential; in emergency room for prevention of early MI in combo with plavix, lovonex and stents; to start in early ?04

Stemi advance MI market is shrinking, that?s why trial was cancelled

Ken Bate

Assumptions:

Next 3 years: based on current labels on I and V; existing products and existing collaborations; all that we need to do is execute

Growth beyond 2006: pipeline + new indications of existing products

No plans to go to capital markets

Likeliest revenue contributors in 2006-2010: 1202, 2704, 518, 944

20% annual r&d expense reduction = ~ 100 m, fully effective by 2nd ½ 2004

10-20 % sg&a annual increase, which includes I salesforce increase

more than 800 m cash entering 2004

capex reduced 50% after restructuring

restructuring charges: 225-250 M through 2005; 1/3 noncash, 2/3 cash over 3 years

get 60% I in US

I inventories coming down

I price increase at end of 3rd q

2nd q&a

1. any measurement of V off-label use? - - don?t collect data like that

2. duration of V treatment? - - too early to tell

3. I inventory levels? - - market is flat to slightly growing; expects to end year with greater than 300 m of I revenue with about 1.2-1.3 months inventory; 4th q started weak

4. what will be effect of drug-eluting stents? - - does not foresee negative impact on gp inhibitors; expects that if stents are used in cath lab and angioplasty, then gp inhibitors will grow; will have better data in 6-8 months

5. how is V trial for colorectal cancer accruing? - - on target at 20 US sites

6. why did apex accrue rapidly? - - as expected

7. will crusade data achieve ss? - - after risk-adjustment with more patients, they expect it will

8. how big will acs study be? - - it will be large; in final design phase; will be realistic and well-powered

9. when will you update on 4 V signals? - - end of year

10. any residual value in metabolic program? - - no, all stuff went to abbott

11. update on V front line study? - - some trials are ongoing; 2 q ?05 fda commitment

12. update on maintenance trial? - - some people on 23 cycles; apex trial has some maintenance; apex data analysis early ?05

13. are there mantel cell databases you will use? - - yes

14. barry greene?s departure? - - he was project leader and had limited role once V was approved; david is strategic V person now

15. what are risk factors for 2006 profitability ? - - V sales

16. what was I price increase? - - 5.2%; both competitors had taken price increases recently
>> Reopro and Angiomax also increased the price

17. 518 only effective with mutation? - - enrolling patients with and without mutation
>> very excited about it

18. when will we see 518 data? - - asco ?04 or ash ?04

19. anecdotal data on V launch vis-a-vis T ? - - no direct answer

20. what % of I patients are treated at best practices hospitals? - - no direct answer

21. when p 1 data for 944? - - 1 year

22. 944 for what solid tumors? - - too early to tell

23. are competitors' discounts for large buyers of I causing you to do likewise? - - reopro gives 0-10% discount

24. how will 70 I salespeople cover all clinical cardiologists? - - 80/20 rule

25. do you assume that V will work in solid tumors beyond 2006? - - not specifically

26. how much impact did new I salesforce make on 3 q revenue? - - a direct effect

27. jnj payments booked as revenue? - - yes

28. is there pent-up demand for V? - - no direct answer

29. why did you go into larger colorectal cancer trial? - - strong preclinical models and (i) to establish V single agent activity and (ii) followup of p 1 safety trial with irinatecan

30. won?t there be a large cost for 5 new I trials? - - the acs trial would be large and expensive; the other 4 would be much less expensive; both expenditures are reimbursed in part by partners

31. I spend vs V spend? - - no direct answer; V has 40 investigator-initiated trials now and will likely go to 80

32. EU approval update? - - norm is beyond a year; expecting 1st ½ ?04

33. 518-like competitors produced equivocal data. Why are you so aggressive? - - 518 is different from competitors

34. I inventories vary based on price increases. Are you trying to do something about that? - - increase demand

35. with uncertainty at sgp, will you get I for yourself? - - sgp says that I is one of their largest opportunities

36. I progress in europe by sgp? - - no direct answer
>> It is not clear how I will fit in EU market

37. if get success in acs trial, can a 2% improvement in mortality be cost-justified? - - trying to reach 900,000 patients who go to cath lab; hospital administrators like gp inhibitors because it reduces the length of stay, a key financial element for them
>> Hospitals face fixed reimbursements under DRG's and since I reduces stays it controls hospital costs leading to better profitability for the hospitals.

Impressions

Great quarter. Faster than expected r&d savings; greater V and I revenue than expected; I share increased from 68% to 71%. The I marketing guy has both a keen strategic sense and tactical flair and has reinvigorated I program; great presentation and explanation on portfolio management criteria , as well as on how they will leverage their skills; ken bate certainly has instilled a strong sense of financial discipline; short-term, intermediate and longer-term plans make more sense. Looking good !

sales