SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (77682)10/17/2003 9:45:45 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
It's not a few days. In can take weeks to die of starvation.



To: Lane3 who wrote (77682)10/17/2003 9:49:56 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Here's a quote from Kevorkian:

Even the infamous Jack Kevorkian, Dr. Death, in an effort to encourage support for his assisted suicide practice, spoke about the cruelty of death from starvation, taking from 2 days to 2 weeks for a patient die: “allowing someone to starve to death and to die of thirst, the way we do now, is barbaric. Our Supreme Court has validated barbarism. The Nazis did that in concentration camps…It took her (Nancy Cruzan) a week to die. Try it! You think that just because you're in a coma you don't suffer?” (Clowes)
........

while I am fully supportive of euthanasia, I think the "eu" needs to be emphasized.



To: Lane3 who wrote (77682)10/17/2003 2:07:25 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
But it isn't unnecessary. If we were less squeamish, when we are letting someone die, we would just give them an injection to finish them off quickly. I know, that's active instead of passive, but that's a distinction medicine has now made untenable to base policy on.