Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (117265)	10/20/2003 1:21:53 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

He said what his plan is: Do what Saladin did. That means make a truce with the Crusaders, give up for now the goal of pushing them into the sea, agree to let everyone visit in peace all the holy sites. Everyone gets part of what they want, and the war ends. That's what Sadadin did. Jacob, you really need to read some history. Maybe that's why you come to such peculiar conclusions; you don't know history. Saladin defeated the Crusaders in the Battle of Hattin in 1187 and destroyed the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Here's an original account: fordham.edu You don't see it, but Mahathir is throwing Israel a life-line ...to their own destruction! There is no other reasonable conclusion from the premise "the Jews rule the world by proxy" Why can't you see that? Do you agree with Mahathir? What does it matter whether Jews "colonize" any more "Arab" land or not - as Mahathir himself just said in a so-called "correction", the problem with Jews is the creation of Israel. It's Israel's existence that is the problem, they don't care about its borders. Show me one single sentence that Mahathir has said that would be in any way changed if Israel withdrew to the 67 borders tomorrow. There isn't one. When the Islamic states get nukes, then we will see if they really feel suicidal or not.