SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (13167)10/20/2003 6:01:53 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793689
 
Using that argument alone would mean the immediate removal of all polygamy restrictions.

There is much more to it than that.



To: Lane3 who wrote (13167)10/20/2003 8:42:44 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793689
 
Yes, somehow I thought that each of us gets to choose what and who, if anything, is needed to achieve "completion

The State has always held the right to make your marriage legal or not. The argument used on it is "are you willing to allow incest, etc?" The vast majority of people are not willing. So once you allow the state's nose under the tent, it gets down to, "How much and what kind of control should the state have over the marriage vow?"


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News