Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (176842)	10/21/2003 5:51:24 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576322

The Miranda act was redefining and expanding the meaning of the EXISTING 5th amendment. It was not creating new law but rather expanding existing law. The Miranda Act was passed by Congress YEARS after the Miranda decision created the law that required the Miranda warning. "For example, when the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda warnings were required, it became the law across the United States, even though no legislature passed the law or codified it." Everyone on this thread has had to admit they were wrong about something in the past. Except for YOU. If you can make yourself do it this one time, I think it will be much easier for you in the future when you are obviously maintaining an idiotic position and are called on it. You just admitted that the Miranda decision by the SC had to be made into law by Congress but you still want me to admit I'm wrong. I can admit I was wrong but that's hard to do when you just validated what I was saying.