Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (117317)	10/21/2003 11:29:21 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I forget who said it - that sometimes, when we try to be too brief, we may compromise intelligibility. I do fall into this trap of excessive brevity from time to time. I agree with you. My point was that public mood usually changes slowly and gradually. I suppose it is possible that an enormous cataclysmic event can jolt a community or a nation from one extreme of social mood into another. I think that a few years ago the Israelis, for example, had to re-adjust themselves rather quickly from an experience of (relative) peace and economic prosperity - and to the realities of a new "Intifada". We get used to good times and we get used to bad times, and they become part of us. An Afghani youngster - who grew up in the saddle, among fighters, surrounded by continuous warfare - will easily switch into the psychological mode of a warrior, who is ready to kill or to be killed. A comfortable liberal Westerner would have difficulties with that. IMO, the challenges we are facing will not simply go away, and will probably take decades or generations to resolve - if they ever do. And they will not resolve in a compromise. How can there be compromise when you deal with religious fanatics? As the ancients used to say, Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum. Again, I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.