Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (480060)	10/22/2003 4:56:36 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Kerry seems to be able to learn from past events. It is not unusual to assume that the President is an honest guy, especially if many people are touting him as decent. Now that Kerry has learned that Bush is either dishonest or completely out of touch with reality, he is no longer granting Bush the benefit of the doubt. We can't expect our leaders to know everything right away, but we can expect them to learn from mistakes. Junior doesn't even recognize mistakes much less learn, which is why any one of the competing candidates would be a better choice to lead the country. TP

To: American Spirit who wrote (480060)	10/22/2003 6:29:59 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Many who voted for the war powers resolution have him the benefit if the doubt. Bush promised to go the UN route and only invade as a last resort. He lied. Let's hear Kerry say that, then. I've heard Kennedy say it, I hear Kerry being a bit wishy-washy, not saying Bush lied, and saying he would have done something different, but doesn't know quite what. Dean is clear about it. Let the inspectors inspect, go to war only upon imminent danger. Kerry seems to want it both ways, including the Edwards way, go to war anyway, even if there weren't WMDs. That leads to the question - which way is it?