Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (21383)	10/22/2003 11:00:43 PM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 21876

'are we going to see the carriers spend more?'" Mr Kamman added. "So far we are hearing a pretty emphatic no." news.ft.com

To: John Carragher who wrote (21383)	10/25/2003 3:17:59 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

<<maybe its creative financing>> Yes. It was. Notter Nixes Lucent Oct 24, 2003 Lucent's pension funds may be providing some smoke and mirrors in the recent report of a profitable quarter. At least that's the sentiment that seems to guide one analyst's downgrade of the company's shares. George Notter of Deutsche Bank AG <http://www.db.com> slapped a Sell rating on Lucent's shares in a note he sent to clients this morning, claiming the company's pension income is making Lucent's income statement look better than it really is. Whoa, Nellie, what's this? An analyst being a real analyst? Looks that way. The main troubling item in Notter's report is that Lucent generated $685 million in pension income during fiscal 2003, says Notter. Pension income is not cash available to shareholders, Notter explains. Rather, it's an income statement item that shows up anytime the "assumed return on pension fund assets exceeds pension expense." So what? "Without [Lucent's pension income], Lucent is not a profitable company next year -- despite significant operating margin expansion the Street is building into models," Notter writes. In other words, Lucent's most recent profitable quarter -- the first in three years -- was more a product of confused accounting than a sign that the company has righted itself under Pat Russo's guidance. Notter is not the only analyst backing away from Lucent these days. The average analyst rating on Lucent's stock is worse now than it has been in 13 weeks, according to Multex.com. Five analysts have a Sell rating on Lucent, while another 28 either rate it as a Hold or Underperform -- two of the bottom three out of five possible stock rankings. While the company is cutting its retiree benefits quickly, some on Wall Street feel its been carrying the burden of expensive retirement plans for too long. In a recent cross-country tour, former Lucent chairman Henry Schacht complained that Lucent's retiree healthcare benefits cost some $850 million per year (see Lucent Retirees Get the Schacht <http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=40882> ). Lucent expects about $8 billion to $9 billion in revenue in 2003, and it isn't expected to break even this year. If all that weren't enough, Notter writes that, after a seasonally strong quarter in December, Lucent's prospects look a bit dimmer after the beginning of the year. In his note, Notter puts a $2.00 price target on Lucent's shares. In early afternoon trading on Friday, Lucent was trading down $0.16 (5.65%) to $2.67. - Phil Harvey, Senior Editor, Light Reading <http://www.lightreading.com> Consolidation is the solution. NT or ALA as potential candidates.