SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (480339)10/23/2003 8:24:20 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Expect Bush approval rate to plunge to new low. Bush, the lying corporate corrupt fascist POS, will burn and boil in his own criminal filth.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (480339)10/23/2003 8:43:15 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
WHAT THE DEMOCRATS WON'T TELL YOU

By Ron Marr
Oct 23, 2003, 00:20

We are now approaching the beginning of the race for the Oval Office. As usual, the same tired old candidates are trotting out the same tired old clichés. This is particularly true of the Democrats, who once again are focusing their message on those who wish something for nothing, those who do not value work or sacrifice, those who contribute the least and consume the most. They are parroting the heinous line they have utilized for decades. No matter if the speaker is Dean, Clark, Kerry, Lieberman, Gephardt or Edwards, the diatribe is the same.

"You haven't been treated fairly. We will make sure you get your fair share."

Hogwash! Can we please put an end to that age old whine that "life's not fair." Of course it's not fair; I think I knew that by about age six. Moreover, it can't be made fair, despite what the politicians would have you believe. Sometimes opportunity kicks open the door and sits down for supper, picking its teeth and belching profusely. Sometimes it stays home watching re-runs of Gomer Pyle, slurping margaritas and scratching itself. All men may be created equal, but equality pretty much ends at conception. After that, you're on your own.

The examples are glaring; the Democrats wish to pit the rich (by whom they mean anyone with a job) against the poor (those on welfare). On October 3rd, Kerry stood on the floor of the Senate and actually suggested that the more prosperous Americans should help pay the $87 billion dollar supplemental spending request for the war in Iraq.

"It's not unfair to ask those that earn the very most - those many fortunate, talented and hardworking Americans earning more than $300,000 - to sacrifice some of their tax cuts in order to promote a free Iraq; to reduce some of the burden being placed on future generations; and help sustain education, health care, and homeland security," said Kerry.

Yes, it is unfair Senator. If such people wish to volunteer money they earned, fine. But it is no more fair to steal their funds by government mandate than it is to take the last ten bucks from the night janitor at McDonalds. A crook is a crook, no matter if he rips off a million bucks or a hundred.

More? Dick Gephardt, on his "Gephardt for President" web site, tells us that he has "a lifelong history fighting for issues that matter most to working families: good jobs, FAIR wages, and a level playing field." He also says that "as president, he will "make health care affordable for all working Americans, create a universal pension plan to follow workers from the moment they are born to the moment they retire, and he will continue to defend the rights of American workers."

Wow...Dick says he will make things fair from cradle to grave. The man would have made a good Marx brother. I'm referring to Karl Marx, of course. Not Groucho

Let's see, Howard Dean expounds that "instead of working to create shared prosperity for all, this administration and the right-wing ideologues that surround it continue to pursue a narrow agenda designed to help their friends, while leaving the rest of America behind."

Shared prosperity? I guess that means taking from those who sweat and toil, and giving to those who spend their days hanging out at the local bar. But then again, In Dean's view, and that of his fellow Democrats, "shared prosperity" is defined as appropriating money from people with jobs and giving to those who support the Donkey party with votes, no matter how lazy or shiftless they happen to be

That's probably enough; you get the idea. Check out the speeches and press releases of every Democratic candidate and you will find a very similar theme. The promises revolve heavily around wealth re-distribution and class warfare. Toss in a smidgen of race-baiting and you have the Democratic campaign strategy in a nutshell.

What the Democrats won't tell you is that they seek to control every aspect of your life...to toss you scraps and bones in exchange for your support and praise and liberty. They won't tell you that in order to live, and live with joy, you have to have something (or several somethings) that trip your trigger. You have to try, you have to fail, you have to dust yourself off and try again WITHOUT the assistance of Big Brother. They will not tell you that it is up to you to make your own success, or that it is dishonorable to steal the rewards earned by another.

Nothing in life is fair; that's a truism the Democrats will never admit.

For they think you're fairly stupid.

bigjweb.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (480339)10/23/2003 8:46:52 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Contributions to Democrats blocks needed litigation reform

posted: October 23, 2003

by Nick Pascale
Opinions editor

A recently announced lawsuit is bringing video game companies who develop games with violent graphic sequences into a state court on the grounds that their games caused a sniper to kill a woman.

Whether or not this litigation can hold water will be up to the courts to decide, but the potential award amount will undoubtedly reflect other awards given by state courts, awards that reach astronomical amounts, in most cases leading companies into bankruptcy.

A bill aimed at keeping trial lawyers from gaining such lucrative sums failed to pass a vote on the Senate floor. The bill would have taken most lawsuits, particularly class action suits, out of the state courts and have them tried in federal court.

The objective of the bill is to better enable the courts throw out frivolous suits and limit the award money that lines the pockets of trial lawyers instead of the pockets of the victims.

But since the Democratic Party shares the wealth of the trial lawyers (a majority of big time trial lawyers contribute to the Democratic Party) the bill failed to pass.

Given the runaway litigation after tobacco settlements, gun manufactures, and now software companies, the country cannot simply sit back and watch trial lawyers continue to undermine the civil courts and add further stress to the American economy.

The Democrats have tried to cover up their trial lawyer campaign financing by claiming they want reform, but not the way the bill prescribed. But how can we deny that moving litigation from the state to federal level?

Do the Democratic senators not see the fight trial lawyers put forth to move suits to plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions, such as Mississippi.

Beyond the victims, outlandish rewards and pool of money-hungry lawyers will create an environment where businesses will be reluctant to develop.

Why would foreign investors finance projects in America if there were widespread fear of litigation resulting in bankruptcy?

Why would domestic companies further invest in the economy while paying for in-house attorneys? The answer is they won’t. America needs this legislation to pass so that accountability and the interests of the victim can be restored to the civil courts.

collegiatetimes.com