SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (13512)10/23/2003 5:22:30 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793603
 
They were discussing this on the radio yesterday. If she dies her husband stands to inherit a lot of money. If they are divorced he gets nothing. He did get an insurance payment that was supposed to go to therapy for Terry. He spent that on his fiancee with whom he has one child and another in the oven. BTW, Terry had filed for divorce when she had her chemical imbalance that caused the heart attack.



To: Rambi who wrote (13512)10/23/2003 5:26:19 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 793603
 
No one I have talked to has said they would want to be kept alive as Terry Schiavo has been for 13 years. Not one person.

Well, now you know one - me.

When I imagine being in a state where it is ethical to "pull the plug," it's in far worse condition than Terry Schiavo is now. I wouldn't pull the plug on any member of my family who was in her condition, either.

People do recover from persistent vegetative states.

I certainly hope it wouldn't last for 13 years, but where would one draw the line?