Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (117499)	10/23/2003 1:25:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Um. That makes it ok? Anyway, you'll have to square that with the vast CIA/Saudi/Democrat conspiracy on the matter that's being postulated by others. Dogma seems divided here. If it was in fact wide-spread knowledge that she was CIA (didn't she work in HQ?), it doesn't strike me as a very big deal. I'm not looking to give anybody a blanket pass on dirty tricks; it just seems to me that when somebody starts yelling about dirty tricks, the dirty trick in question should actually make some sense as, well, a dirty trick. Gives more plausibility to the charge, you know. As for the CIA/State/Democrat side in this fight, they've clearly concluded that the best defense is a good offense.