SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (78287)10/23/2003 4:06:06 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
I totally agree.

I love a paper trail.
Have one on each kid. More than most teachers, actually, since I have both tests and portfolios.



To: Rambi who wrote (78287)10/23/2003 7:39:54 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Elian, are you listening?

In Blow to Bush, Senate Votes to Ease Cuba Travel Limits
By CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS

Published: October 23, 2003

ASHINGTON, Oct. 23 — In a firm rebuke to President Bush over Cuba policy, the Senate voted overwhelmingly today to ease travel restrictions on Americans seeking to visit the island.

The 59-to-38 vote came less than two weeks after President Bush, in a Rose Garden ceremony, announced that he would tighten the travel ban in an attempt to halt illegal tourism there.


The House passed a similar measure by a wide margin on Sept. 9. So today's vote placed the president and Republican Congressional leaders uncomfortably on a collision course, leaving an angry White House threatening to veto an important spending bill and a growing number of lawmakers from both parties demanding an overhaul of the American sanctions regime against Havana.

The vote also highlighted a widening split between farm-state Republicans, who oppose trade sanctions in general or are eager to increase sales to Cuba, and Cuban-American leaders, whom the White House views as essential to the president's political strength in Florida.

Several influential Republican senators voted against the president, including John Warner of Virginia, the chairman of the armed services committee, and Pat Roberts of Kansas, the chairman of the intelligence committee, as well as numerous conservatives from rural states, including Senators James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Sam Brownback of Kansas and Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas.

Senator Mike Enzi, a Wyoming Republican who co-sponsored the amendment, criticized what he called an American "stranglehold" on Cuba, a nation of 11 million located within 100 miles of United States shores. The decades-old travel ban, he said, merely deepens the misery of Cubans without providing fresh ideas to the Marxist-led nation.

"Unilateral sanctions stop not just the flow of goods, but the flow of ideas," Senator Enzi said. "Ideas of freedom and democracy are the keys to positive change in any nation."

The White House countered that allowing unfettered American travel to Cuba would provide the government of President Fidel Castro with an economic bonanza, allowing him to cover up his shortcomings as a repressive dictator.

"It is vitally important to maintain these sanctions and restrictions," said one senior administration official. Their purpose, he said, "is to prevent unlicensed tourism in Cuba, which provides economic resources — American dollars — to the Castro regime, while doing nothing to help the Cuban people."

The official said the president's advisers would recommend that he veto the bill if it emerges from a conference committee.

President Bush made his own case for the restrictions on Oct. 10, when he pledged to step up enforcement of the travel ban, by intensifying inspections of travelers and shipments to and from Cuba. The Department of Homeland Security immediately announced that it would direct "intelligence and investigative resources" to identify travelers or businesses that circumvent the sanctions against Cuba.

Mr. Bush's announcement, which included the creation of a commission to plan for a post-Castro Cuba, represented the first substantive response to a mounting outcry among some Cuban exile groups over Mr. Castro's imprisonment of about 75 Cuban dissidents last spring. In addition, some Cuban American leaders had voiced outrage of the administration's decision to repatriate 12 Cubans accused of hijacking a government boat.