SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (22762)10/24/2003 12:18:49 AM
From: VAUGHN  Respond to of 39344
 
Hello Eric

That's quite a jump from 2 million oz.!

As you know I own PFN and am certainly a believer in the potential of that play but what parameters and of course what assumptions did you make to guestimate the 32 million oz. figure.

10kms x width? x depth? x .5oz./cm? or 1.5oz./tonne?

Thanks Eric

Vaughn



To: E. Charters who wrote (22762)10/24/2003 12:21:49 AM
From: Condor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
32 million ounces??? I heard Barr say they had a million and were going for two??
32 million ounces at that grade would encompass Garson to Gravenhurst.:o)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News