Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (2872)	10/26/2003 2:16:34 AM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 22250

re: to the Russian Turko-Mongolian tribes really? D'you know that khazars were not jewish? The jews were only the ruling class. The ruling class brought Hebrews to Khazar kingdom many of which were of Hebrew priest's blood. When Khazar kingdom was destroyed the fleeing to Russia Khazars build villages that were completely isolated from russian Jews. The people in those villages became known as khazaks - well known haters of Jews. Ashkenazi are of the middle eastern blood. We even look like arabs and not turks or mongolian. Now, having said that, considering that Khazar kingdom was the most progressive kingdom of its time with not only complete tolerance for all religions and breeds but real true equality, if I would be of khazar royal blood (all khazar jews were of royal blood or Hebrews) I would be proud of it but I am a Hebrew, just like your God. So bow to me and kiss the ground I am walking on <gggggg>

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (2872)	10/26/2003 6:07:35 PM
From: Elmer Flugum	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 22250

Here is a question for you Emile. I was listening to an interview of Alan Dershowitz and in the course of the interview, which was basically a promotion for his latest book, "The Case for Israel", Mr. Dershowitz claimed that the Palestinians are partly responsible for the Holocaust as accomplices through the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. My question is: If the Grand Mufti killed no one, directly or indirectly, yet the Isra'Elis (and their agents) can claim that Palestinians/Arabs were accomplices how is that some Jews distance themselves from the death of Jesus, saying that Jews had nothing to do with Jesus' death even though the Rabbis turned him over to the Romans knowing what would happen to him? I ask you because you are a Christian and this matter has probably crossed your mind a time or two. Of course, you may refuse to answer it as well. len