Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3619)	10/27/2003 2:36:28 AM
From: Don Earl	Respond to of 20039

Ray, <<<I think I owe the thread an apology for jumping the gun and posting the physics911.org link before giving it a thorough vetting.>>> No need to apologize as far as I'm concerned. If nothing else, I can't imagine it hurts a thing to look at some of the different concepts and see if any of them hold water. And like you say, there is some interesting content if one is able to wade through some of the absurd (IMO) rhetoric. I don't always read every link I post from cover to cover. A lot of times I'll take a quick look at some of the articles, bookmark it for future reference, and post the link in a FYI vein in case anyone else wants to look at it. I agree a real investigation would eliminate the all the speculation on what really happened. If the official story were legitimate, there would be no need for the obvious cover up, destruction of evidence, and secrecy. Personally I don't have much hope for the Kean Commission. From Kean interviews I've seen, Kean is a weasel. While the Commission has the authority to view classified material, they do not have the authority to disclose anything they uncover to the public. The insider trading issue is a good example. After a two year investigation, no names are disclosed and a press release claims everything was above board. A bit of a slap in the face to anyone looking for confirmation there was or was not a connection to Washington insiders. Every request for information by the Commission should have been in subpoena form. They've been crying the blues about not getting requested information for the better part of a year, when there isn't an attorney in the world who would depend on polite requests for critical evidence on matters orders of magnitude less important than 9/11. It isn't anything personal or political, it's just the gold standard for requesting documents and testimony.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3619)	10/27/2003 8:18:56 AM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 20039

I think I owe the thread an apology for jumping the gun and posting the physics911.org link before giving it a thorough vetting. I accept your apology, with the hope that you continue to tighten up your analytical processes and, at the same time, develop a truly skeptical mindset. Blathering hysterics and rhetoric worthy of the far right are little more than a hindrance to assessing information efficiently. LPS5

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3619)	10/27/2003 10:12:06 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 20039

I say put it all out here for everyone to look at. No apology is needed. Every site can have some inaccuracy and still have good information too. I'm not saying I found any inaccuracies. Just speaking in general.