To: milo_morai who wrote (103734 ) 10/27/2003 6:35:38 AM From: Rink Respond to of 275872 INQ: Japanese article says Prescott delayed till Q2: The Japanese article says systems won't work with 800MHz front side buses, while Intel is frantically attempting to create fresh packaging and a further stepping – C1 – for the chip. But qualification samples, the article continues, aren't likely to go out the door until December. That means that if Intel makes its own February deadline, volume is unlikely to appear until the second quarter of next year. And Intel's most recent roadmaps suggested that it would start using the LGA775 design for Prescott in Q2 as well, which is when its "Grantsdale" chipsets are supposed to appear. Ref: inquirerinside.com The INQ also draws the obvious and imo right conclusion with regards to pricing cuts: Intel dropped the prices of the P4/3.2 from $637 to $417, a gesture usually accompanied by a new processor introduction. When Intel does this without a new slice of silicon, it is not a gesture of goodwill , or an indication that the trucks that vacuum the wads of cash out of the Intel vaults are late this week, it the price hammer. If Intel had the lead in mindshare or raw speed, which it pretty much always has had, AMD has to respond. It always did like good little followers. Friday, Intel cut, and on everything that mattered, the Athlon64s and top Opterons, AMD didn't change prices a bit. Shortages abound on the FX chips, but several resellers tell me that they are not having problems with 64/3200+ availability. This points toward AMD deftly avoiding the price hammer strike, and doing what it wants. That is more telling than any published roadmap now isn't it. Ref: inquirerinside.com Veritas will support SuSE's product line in stages , Nevatia said. First will come support for the version for "x86" processors, such as Intel's Xeon or Advanced Micro Devices' Athlon. Later will come support for SuSE Linux running on Intel's Itanium and IBM's zSeries mainframes. AMD's Opteron processor, which can run x86 software but also departs from that design with support for 64-bit software, is another question. "The Opteron platform is still being investigated," Nevatia said, as is support for IBM's pSeries Unix servers and iSeries midrange servers. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39117401,00.htm WRT Cray: It's hard to imagine this Cray announcement without them having another customer in the bag! This also should aid the momentum of Opteron as Itanium 2 competitor. That said I haven't heard many announcement of large Opteron clusters recently though... Kind regards, Rink