Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew who wrote (22932)	10/27/2003 2:06:05 AM
From: TrueScouse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

Andrew: Good post. LJ's summary charts are excellent and they go a lot further in helping people position their equity than this silly dispute between two juniors that probably make up no more than 5% of most people's PFs. What poor Michael doesn't seem to get is that some of us -- CC included I'm sure -- held IMA for several years from about $0.55 and were already disillusioned by their performance in Peru long before their drilling "fracaso" in Argentina. In my case I took profits at an average price of $1.65 for a 198% gain on my IMA position. But it was never more than 5% of my PF anyway, so I really couldn't care less what they do next. Don't sweat the small stuff. The big picture is that there's a mega-trend in PMs underway and provided you set up a good diversified PF in the PM stocks and be patient, you'll do very well. That's what LJ contributes with his excellent charts -- the big picture. JMHO. Regards, Howy

To: Andrew who wrote (22932)	10/27/2003 4:59:09 AM
From: jrhana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

<It seems like there is too much time wasted on the legal issues surrounding two POS juniors for anyone to notice LJ's great post. Well perhaps many lurkers are reading and appreciated it I know I did.> Agree we all here just pissing in the wind. Definitely need to move on to some other topic. My last comment (and sorry about that) is that IR and AQI did say they thought this thing would be settled and soon. Hopefullly the two companies ares sitting down and talking intensely. This I swear is my last post on the subject until at least we get some hard data.