SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (482229)10/27/2003 1:32:31 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "It would take an extended analysis in the future to find out...."

>>> Yep, that is correct... too soon to be sure of the effects.

>>> For example, is the 'luxury tax' causing people to buy cheaper, more fuel efficient cars?

>>> Or is it merely causing them to forgo purchases of luxury autos just for now? ...In which case, as their older autos eventually wear out, purchases will resume, having been merely delayed, not abandoned.



To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (482229)10/27/2003 2:27:38 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Prestige luxury cars are not bought by the wealthy because they are a good value for the money, they are bought to show others that they can afford them. It is unlikely that a hike in sales tax will change the behavior of conspicuous consumption.

TP



To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (482229)10/27/2003 8:10:21 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
The fewer cars in California the better. Way too many of them now. Arnold has no way of balancing the budget without raising taxes. And now these fires add another huge burden. Ouch