SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (482450)10/27/2003 9:01:14 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Maybe you don't underdstand about 90% of California spending is mandatory and the rest Arnold has vowed not to cut.

I challenged you on that number earlier and you said you "heard" it somewhere:

Message 19390169 (you saying you "heard" the 90 percent number but citing only Prop. 13, which controls revenue but not spending).

Message 19389538

For you, that is the equivalent of "I made it up and if I can find some suckers maybe they will believe it." Well, guess what, 90 percent of the California budget is not "mandatory" in the sense that it cannot be changed by the legislature and the governor. The governor has a line item veto which can cut all sorts of spending. Four years back, when California had tens of thousands fewer state employees, it didn't let its prisoners out of jail. Are you trying to tell us that all those new employees California hired during the Davis years were prison guards, and without them the convicts must be allowed to roam free? You expect people to believe that? From you, the king (or is it queen?) of truthfulness and factual accuracy?



To: American Spirit who wrote (482450)10/27/2003 9:03:25 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
While 90% of the budget may be mandatory, if he declares a state of emergency, the Governor would no longer be tied to spending mandates. Governor Davis could have done this with the budget, and he could have done it sooner with the Energy Crisis.



To: American Spirit who wrote (482450)10/27/2003 9:11:33 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Lieberman to Kerry: 'How come you will not support the troops now, seeing as how you voted for the war'?

Kerry to Lieberman: 'How dare you talk that way...don't you know I am a war hero'?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA