SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (30713)10/29/2003 9:14:49 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 89467
 
Tiger...I attended a talk by Sy Hershe (sp) last night..
He is wired to Washington DC..'a friend' of Bob Novack.....Met Val Plame... has talked to Colin Powell...many "insiders" in Politics...the Military
His View ..is this 'New' War effort is being run by Saddam himself...
and was planned long before we invaded
Saddam is fat with cash...guns...and History..
Saddam is going to up the attacks from here on out according to Hershe.......(two more GI's died in a tank attack today)
Time will tell..........
Tim

Saddam’s top aide
seen behind attacks


Officials say Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri directing insurgent strikes in Iraq


By Jim Miklaszewski and Robert Windrem
NBC NEWS



BAGHDAD, Iraq, Oct. 29 — A key member of Saddam Hussein’s inner circle is believed to be directing the series of attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq, U.S. military and intelligence sources told NBC News. Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, the No. 2 man in the Iraqi government, is one of the few remaining members of the Iraq leadership to remain at large since the Saddam regime was toppled by U.S.-led forces.
























A suicide bomber killed himself and at least four others in Iraq Tuesday, while a U.S. soldier was confirmed killed and six other troops wounded in a rocket attack. NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski reports on the suspected leader behind the violence.


THE MILITARY and intelligence sources told NBC News that several members of the Ansar al-Islam terrorist group rounded up last weekend in Iraq claim al-Douri is the mastermind behind many of the latest terrorist attacks.
Al-Douri, 61, was the vice chairman of the Baath Party’s Revolutionary Command Council, Iraq’s highest governing body. Constitutionally, he was No. 2 in the government, behind Saddam, who served as chair of the council.
With Qusay and Uday Hussein, presidential secretary Abed Hameed Mahmoud, and Vice President Taha Ramadan, he formed Saddam’s innermost circle. All of the others are either captured or dead. Only he and Saddam apparently still survive, and there are some, still a minority in U.S. intelligence, who believe Saddam, too, is dead.
Al-Douri was the only member of the inner circle known to have been outside of Baghdad when the city fell to U.S. forces April 9, having set up his headquarters in the northern city of Mosul.
And because of his working knowledge of the Baath Party apparatus, al-Douri would know who could be trusted, who had the key organizational and military skills.
“Al-Douri has the ‘Baath Party Rolodex,’ the roster of party members around the country,” said William M. Arkin, an NBC News military analyst, who noted that al-Douri also has ties with the ruling Baath Party in Syria. The two countries and their respective Baath parties regularly feuded, with Syria supporting the United States in the Gulf War in 1991. But in 2000, the two put aside differences and formed a trade union.
“Al-Douri predates Saddam in the Baath Party,” Arkin added. “He is one of the first members of the Iraqi branch of the party, and since the party was founded in Syria, he has those connections with Baath Party officials in Syria. Thus, the influx of Syrian fighters could be explained by al-Douri’s connection.”




A SURVIVOR
Ruthless, loyal, and vain, al-Douri, like Saddam, has the mentality of the ultimate survivor, U.S. officials said. The two men in fact met in prison in the 1960s, and in 1973, Saddam gave him his first important job — heading a tribunal that tried, convicted and sentenced 22 men charged with plotting to overthrow the party. All 22 were executed.
So skillful was he at pleasing Saddam, he is one of only three survivors of the 1968 coup that brought the Baath Party to power in Iraq.
Known for his distinctive red hair and mustache, al-Douri was the man who was most involved in running the Iraqi government and the party. He was known as a bureaucratic in-fighter who served as Saddam’s eyes and ears in the government and Baath Party.
The ultimate apparatchik, he held his position from 1979 when Saddam gained power until the United States launched Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Al-Douri’s personal ties to Saddam were further secured in 1988 when his daughter was married for a short time to Saddam’s son Uday. The marriage ended after Uday reportedly beat al-Douri’s daughter.
















AN ICE SELLER
Like most of the Baath Party pioneers, al-Douri came from modest but not impoverished origins, beginning his working life as an ice seller. Some reports claim al-Douri, like Saddam, is originally from Tikrit, but most believe he was born in Mosul, and he was last known to be in that city, having been dispatched by Saddam just before the war to command Iraq’s northern defenses.
The al-Douri clan, in fact, is centered in the area surrounding Mosul.
Although he cast himself mostly in Saddam’s shadow, al-Douri had his moments. Twice in the months before the war, he attracted international attention.
On Oct. 17, 2002, after declaring Saddam the unanimous winner in the Iraqi presidential race, al-Douri congratulated Saddam by presenting him with a sword.
On March 5, two weeks before the war, he shouted, “Shut up, you monkey!” at a Kuwaiti diplomat during an emergency summit of Islamic nations, adding in a particularly memorable phrase, “Curse be upon your mustache (honor), you traitor.”
He has no military experience, but was known as being as ruthless as Saddam in internal Iraqi matters. He is believed to be responsible for thousands, if not tens of thousands, of deaths in both the Kurdish north and the Shite south.
He would often preside over special Baath Party tribunals that tried Saddam’s opponents and issued death sentences, according to intelligence reports. He was in charge of the Kurdish region when many Kurds were gassed in the 1980s and in charge of the Shiite south when the Republican Guard brutally put down the population there in 1991.
When he traveled to Vienna, Austria, in 1999 for medical treatment, demands for his arrest on war crimes charges became so vocal that Saddam called him home to avoid embarrassment — and arrest.



Indict.org, a British human rights group, quoted a Shiite human rights campaigner who described al-Douri’s personal involvement in a violent clampdown in southern Iraq.
At one point, after about 600 people were arrested, al-Douri allegedly ordered 17 prisoners to be tied to posts in the military base. “They had some sort of glue put in their mouths to prevent them calling out,” the campaigner said, before they were shot by Baath officials. “Then strangely, four gypsy dancing girls were brought to dance for those watching” before 170 men were killed in all.

CREDIBILITY?
Yet, despite his violent reputation, Arkin said al-Douri has support among Iraq’s Sunni intelligentsia, who see him as representing Saddam.
“In fact, he could make the case that Baathist ideology represents something different from the regime,” Arkin said. “It represents secular, technological, Arab nationalism and socialism and appeals to the intelligentsia. Even though he was a Saddam loyalist, the fact that he was not SRG [Special Republican Guard] or Republican Guard makes him more acceptable to some,” he said.
“He is one of the few people, because of his past, who can make this distinction between Baathism and Saddamism, an alternative that is neither fundamentalism nor pro-Americanism,” Arkin said. “You can’t wait around, if you’re an Iraqi, waiting for Iraq to become France.”
Arkin described al-Douri as a prime product of the old system, “which, for some, is an attractive alternative to the Americans.”



To: TigerPaw who wrote (30713)10/29/2003 10:53:35 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
defenselink.mil

Other News Sources
Updated: 07 May 2003



Army General Says Baghdad Secure, Iraqi People Free
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 7, 2003 – The Army general who led the battle of Baghdad said today he is "not particularly concerned about security" in the Iraqi capital.

Lt. Gen. William "Scott" Wallace said his troops occasionally come under small-arms fire, deal with "criminal elements" and witness sporadic celebratory fire. "But, in general terms," he added, "the security situation in Baghdad is improving every day." Wallace spoke to reporters in the Pentagon via a satellite connection to Baghdad.

The Army's 5th Corps commander, who deployed with his unit from Germany, waxed poetic in his opening remarks. "The warm, clear weather (in Baghdad) mirrors the improvements we've made and continue to make on behalf of the people of Iraq," he said. "Over 111,000 soldiers of the Victory Corps fought valiantly to defeat the oppressive regime of Saddam Hussein.

"They have freed the Iraqi people," he added. "They deserve the praise of a grateful nation for their sacrifices."

In a broad-ranging press conference, Wallace espoused some of his own theories of why Iraqi forces didn't use chemical or biological weapons on advancing coalition forces.

One theory is that coalition troops "moved so fast" the Iraqis couldn't get to their weapons. Wallace reminded reporters that U.N inspectors left the country only days before military fighting began. It's conceivable that the Iraqis hid their weapons so effectively from the inspectors that the weapons weren't easily accessible when coalition military forces entered the country, he said.

"And secondly," he added, "I'd like to believe our information operations campaign had an impact on those commanders that might have the opportunity to pull the trigger and they thought it was not such a good idea."

American forces blanketed Iraq with leaflets in the weeks leading up to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Many of the leaflets urged Iraqi forces to abandon their weapons and return to their families. Others warned of dire consequences against any Iraqi soldier who deployed biological or chemical weapons. American broadcasts from the Commando Solo aircraft filled the airways with similar warnings.

Wallace spoke with admiration about the "power of the combined arms team." He recalled, with obvious amusement, one incident in which American airpower decimated Iraqi forces around Hillah as they tried to regroup after an attack from U.S. Army soldiers.

"It was about 3, maybe 4, in the afternoon on a beautiful sunlit day, …" he recalled. "At that point, the U.S. Air Force had a heyday against those repositioning Iraqi forces."

Wallace disputed a reporter's suggestion that U.S. forces didn't have enough troops to control looting that broke out after major military fighting ceased.

"I don't think it was as much an issue of the number of troops as the fact that we were still fighting our ass off as we went into Baghdad," he explained. "And our first responsibility was to defeat the enemy forces, both paramilitary and regular army."

He also said new information shows the Baghdad Museum wasn't looted to the extent first believed. U.S. officials now believe there are only between 17 and 38 artifacts missing, he said.

"What doesn't get reported is the fact that we also secured a significant museum that is located at the (Iraqi version of the) Tomb of the Unknowns in downtown Baghdad," the general added. "That was not looted at all by virtue of our presence."

Wallace had received some criticism for comments he made during the war that Iraqi forces are more formidable than American commanders had expected. An article in today's edition of the International Herald Tribune suggested defense officials are replacing Wallace for his earlier comments.

The general denied that theory today and congratulated the man who has been named as his successor, Maj. Gen. Rick Sanchez. After nearly two years in command, a 5th Corps spokesman said in the article, Wallace is due for reassignment. He remains unapologetic for the earlier remarks.

The enemy that 5th Corps assets encountered in An Najaf, Hillah, Samawah, Karbala and Nasiriyah "was much more aggressive than we expected him to be, or at least than I expected him to be," Wallace said today.

U.S. forces expected Iraqi troops to concentrate on defending towns, when in practice they were "willing to attack out of those towns toward our formations," he said.

The presence of foreign fighters with Saddam's Fedayeen paramilitary force, which Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld called "Saddam's death squads," was also unexpected. Wallace called the members of these death squads "at least fanatical, if not suicidal."

Still, the general said, they were no match for American military might. "Soldiers of the (3rd Infantry Division) and the 101st and 82nd (airborne divisions) reacted very well in adapting to those enemy tactics," he said. "And … 16 days to Baghdad ain't a bad record."



To: TigerPaw who wrote (30713)10/29/2003 12:59:38 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Ahh...WRONG Continent Men.........
Get a Map from Maps.com

""Many of the interpreters don’t have much training for their jobs and only enough specialized knowledge “to tell the difference between a burro and a burrito" Army sources said "

Pentagon weighs WMD hunt cutback

U.S. may switch some Iraq resources to counterinsurgency


ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 — As violence has spiraled in Iraq, top U.S. officials have debated pulling intelligence officers off the so-far unsuccessful hunt for weapons of mass destruction and reassigning them to counterinsurgency efforts, officials said Wednesday.





































THE UNITED STATES already is planning to recruit more Iraqis to gather information about opposition fighters and may increase security measures to protect troops, President Bush said Tuesday, the third straight day of bombings in Iraq.
But Pentagon, CIA and other top officials have not been able to agree on whether to reassign some of the 1,400 people working on the weapons search, three officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Wednesday.
One intelligence official said they have been struggling for more than three weeks over the question of whether shifting intelligence personnel to the battle against insurgent forces would be harmful. Other possibilities include moving the needed intelligence officers, linguists and others from somewhere else, contracting outsiders or options that the official declined to cite.
Some officials have made the case that the No. 1 priority is to stop the attacks on coalition forces, Iraqis and international organizations.
Others are arguing that it’s vitally important to find out what happened to biological and chemical weapons that the Bush administration said Saddam Hussein had and which constituted the main rationale for war.



Any move to reduce those working on the weapons hunt would likely have political implications since critics charge the administration exaggerated the weapons charge to justify a war it had already decided to wage, one official said.

NAVY PILOT SEARCH
The 1,400 in the so-called Iraq Survey Group have been looking for weapons, former regime officials and evidence on the fate of the Navy pilot Scott Speicher, shot down and still missing from the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
At times, translators and analysts have been borrowed from the group to help with other intelligence work, one official said. But formally changing their tasking would require approval of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, the official said.
The CIA is wary about undermining the search for weapons, the New York Times reported in Wednesday editions.
U.S. commanders in Iraq have said for months they were working to improve their intelligence gathering to try to prevent attacks against coalition troops and the Iraqis who help them. They’ve claimed some successes by capturing or killing many of the top 55 most wanted members of the former government and encouraging more Iraqis to tip off troops to weapons caches and opposition fighters.








Yet American officials say they still don’t know who is behind the car bombings that have been striking Baghdad for more than two months, despite the efforts of 130,000 U.S. troops, 22,000 other coalition troops, more than 80,000 Iraqi security forces and dozens of FBI agents.
Meanwhile, Bush said other changes are being planned to bolster Iraq security.
“We’re constantly looking at the enemy and adjusting,” the president said at a Rose Garden news conference. “Iraq is dangerous, and it’s dangerous because terrorists want us to leave, and we’re not leaving.”

UNPREPARED FOR THE JOB?
Also, a scathing internal report on the Army’s information gathering in Iraq found intelligence specialists on the ground unprepared for their jobs and with little ability to analyze what they hear.
The Army report found the service’s intelligence specialists in Iraq “did not appear to be prepared for tactical assignments” and often exhibited “weak intelligence briefing skills” and “very little to no analytical skills.”
The criticism came in a report by a four-member team from the Center for Army Lessons Learned, the Army’s agency for pushing commanders to learn from mistakes. The team visited Army units in Iraq during the first two weeks of June and released its report on an Army Web site last week.
A particular problem, the team said, has been finding enough competent Arabic interpreters to help American forces. Many of the interpreters don’t have much training for their jobs and only enough specialized knowledge “to tell the difference between a burro and a burrito" Army sources said